Granular Computing

Georg Peters
{"title":"Granular Computing","authors":"Georg Peters","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-849-9.ch115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well accepted that in many real life situations information is not certain and precise but rather uncertain or imprecise. To describe uncertainty probability theory emerged in the 17th and 18th century. Bernoulli, Laplace and Pascal are considered to be the fathers of probability theory. Today probability can still be considered as the prevalent theory to describe uncertainty. However, in the year 1965 Zadeh seemed to have challenged probability theory by introducing fuzzy sets as a theory dealing with uncertainty (Zadeh, 1965). Since then it has been discussed whether probability and fuzzy set theory are complementary or rather competitive (Zadeh, 1995). Sometimes fuzzy sets theory is even considered as a subset of probability theory and therefore dispensable. Although the discussion on the relationship of probability and fuzziness seems to have lost the intensity of its early years it is still continuing today. However, fuzzy set theory has established itself as a central approach to tackle uncertainty. For a discussion on the relationship of probability and fuzziness the reader is referred to e.g. Dubois, Prade (1993), Ross et al. (2002) or Zadeh (1995). In the meantime further ideas how to deal with uncertainty have been suggested. For example, Pawlak introduced rough sets in the beginning of the eighties of the last century (Pawlak, 1982), a theory that has risen increasing attentions in the last years. For a comparison of probability, fuzzy sets and rough sets the reader is referred to Lin (2002). Presently research is conducted to develop a Generalized Theory of Uncertainty (GTU) as a framework for any kind of uncertainty whether it is based on probability, fuzziness besides others (Zadeh, 2005). Cornerstones in this theory are the concepts of information granularity (Zadeh, 1979) and generalized constraints (Zadeh, 1986). In this context the term Granular Computing was first suggested by Lin (1998a, 1998b), however it still lacks of a unique and well accepted definition. So, for example, Zadeh (2006a) colorfully calls granular computing “ballpark computing” or more precisely “a mode of computation in which the objects of computation are generalized constraints”.","PeriodicalId":320314,"journal":{"name":"Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"287","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-849-9.ch115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 287

Abstract

It is well accepted that in many real life situations information is not certain and precise but rather uncertain or imprecise. To describe uncertainty probability theory emerged in the 17th and 18th century. Bernoulli, Laplace and Pascal are considered to be the fathers of probability theory. Today probability can still be considered as the prevalent theory to describe uncertainty. However, in the year 1965 Zadeh seemed to have challenged probability theory by introducing fuzzy sets as a theory dealing with uncertainty (Zadeh, 1965). Since then it has been discussed whether probability and fuzzy set theory are complementary or rather competitive (Zadeh, 1995). Sometimes fuzzy sets theory is even considered as a subset of probability theory and therefore dispensable. Although the discussion on the relationship of probability and fuzziness seems to have lost the intensity of its early years it is still continuing today. However, fuzzy set theory has established itself as a central approach to tackle uncertainty. For a discussion on the relationship of probability and fuzziness the reader is referred to e.g. Dubois, Prade (1993), Ross et al. (2002) or Zadeh (1995). In the meantime further ideas how to deal with uncertainty have been suggested. For example, Pawlak introduced rough sets in the beginning of the eighties of the last century (Pawlak, 1982), a theory that has risen increasing attentions in the last years. For a comparison of probability, fuzzy sets and rough sets the reader is referred to Lin (2002). Presently research is conducted to develop a Generalized Theory of Uncertainty (GTU) as a framework for any kind of uncertainty whether it is based on probability, fuzziness besides others (Zadeh, 2005). Cornerstones in this theory are the concepts of information granularity (Zadeh, 1979) and generalized constraints (Zadeh, 1986). In this context the term Granular Computing was first suggested by Lin (1998a, 1998b), however it still lacks of a unique and well accepted definition. So, for example, Zadeh (2006a) colorfully calls granular computing “ballpark computing” or more precisely “a mode of computation in which the objects of computation are generalized constraints”.
细粒度的计算
人们普遍认为,在许多现实生活情况下,信息不是确定和精确的,而是不确定或不精确的。为了描述不确定性,概率论出现在17、18世纪。伯努利、拉普拉斯和帕斯卡被认为是概率论之父。今天,概率论仍然被认为是描述不确定性的流行理论。然而,在1965年,Zadeh似乎通过引入模糊集作为处理不确定性的理论来挑战概率论(Zadeh, 1965)。从那时起,人们就开始讨论概率和模糊集理论是互补的还是竞争的(Zadeh, 1995)。有时模糊集理论甚至被认为是概率论的一个子集,因此是可有可无的。尽管关于概率和模糊性关系的讨论似乎已经失去了早年的激烈程度,但今天仍在继续。然而,模糊集理论已经确立了自己作为解决不确定性的核心方法。关于概率和模糊性关系的讨论,读者可以参考Dubois, Prade (1993), Ross等人(2002)或Zadeh(1995)。同时,对如何处理不确定性提出了进一步的设想。例如,Pawlak在上世纪80年代初引入了粗糙集(Pawlak, 1982),这一理论在最近几年得到了越来越多的关注。对于概率、模糊集和粗糙集的比较,读者可以参考Lin(2002)。目前的研究是建立一个广义不确定性理论(GTU)作为任何一种不确定性的框架,无论它是基于概率、模糊性还是其他(Zadeh, 2005)。该理论的基石是信息粒度(Zadeh, 1979)和广义约束(Zadeh, 1986)的概念。在这种情况下,术语“颗粒计算”是由Lin (1998a, 1998b)首先提出的,但是它仍然缺乏一个独特的、被广泛接受的定义。因此,例如,Zadeh (2006a)生动地将颗粒计算称为“棒球场计算”,或者更准确地说,是“一种计算对象是广义约束的计算模式”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信