{"title":"Consequences of Breach","authors":"Dr Rosemary Teele Langford","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198813668.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides an outline of the consequences of breach of the duties discussed in this book and, in particular, of the duty to avoid conflicts (the conflicts rule) at general law and under statute. This includes discussion of third party liability based on the rule in Barnes v Addy, which may be very valuable in certain circumstances. It highlights the available remedies, as well as issues arising in the framing and application of the remedies. It also draws attention to the role played by the unfair prejudice (or oppression) remedy in relation to directors’ conflicts. Given that this remedy is favoured by shareholders, and that a number of unfair prejudice cases concern directors’ conflicts, it is important to outline its contours. Indirect enforcement, and any significant differences in enforcement mechanisms between the jurisdictions, will be considered. The chapter does not provide a comprehensive outline in relation to all remedies or the detail of every aspect of the remedies discussed. There is, at times, clear divergence between the application of certain remedies in different jurisdictions—a complete and comprehensive comparative critical analysis of remedies would fill an entire book on its own.","PeriodicalId":294282,"journal":{"name":"Company Directors’ Duties and Conflicts of Interest","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Company Directors’ Duties and Conflicts of Interest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198813668.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter provides an outline of the consequences of breach of the duties discussed in this book and, in particular, of the duty to avoid conflicts (the conflicts rule) at general law and under statute. This includes discussion of third party liability based on the rule in Barnes v Addy, which may be very valuable in certain circumstances. It highlights the available remedies, as well as issues arising in the framing and application of the remedies. It also draws attention to the role played by the unfair prejudice (or oppression) remedy in relation to directors’ conflicts. Given that this remedy is favoured by shareholders, and that a number of unfair prejudice cases concern directors’ conflicts, it is important to outline its contours. Indirect enforcement, and any significant differences in enforcement mechanisms between the jurisdictions, will be considered. The chapter does not provide a comprehensive outline in relation to all remedies or the detail of every aspect of the remedies discussed. There is, at times, clear divergence between the application of certain remedies in different jurisdictions—a complete and comprehensive comparative critical analysis of remedies would fill an entire book on its own.
本章概述了违反本书所讨论的义务的后果,特别是在普通法和成文法中避免冲突的义务(冲突规则)。这包括基于Barnes v Addy规则的第三方责任的讨论,这在某些情况下可能非常有价值。它强调了现有的补救办法,以及在制定和适用补救办法时产生的问题。本文还关注了不公平偏见(或压迫)救济在董事冲突中所起的作用。鉴于这一补救措施受到股东的青睐,而且许多不公平的偏见案件涉及董事冲突,因此有必要概述其轮廓。将考虑间接执行,以及司法管辖区之间执行机制的任何重大差异。本章没有对所有救济提供全面的概述,也没有对所讨论的救济的每一个方面提供详细的说明。有时,在不同司法管辖区的某些补救措施的应用之间存在明显的分歧——对补救措施进行完整而全面的比较批判性分析本身就可以写满一整本书。