Classroom Assessment Practices of EFL Lecturers with Current Curriculum Implementation: Where Policy Meets Practice

A. Alfian, M. N. A. Rasyid, Akhmad Habibi, Noprival Noprival, M. Yusuf
{"title":"Classroom Assessment Practices of EFL Lecturers with Current Curriculum Implementation: Where Policy Meets Practice","authors":"A. Alfian, M. N. A. Rasyid, Akhmad Habibi, Noprival Noprival, M. Yusuf","doi":"10.31849/reila.v4i3.11005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the context of Indonesian higher education, the assessment focuses on the three domains of students’ competencies, namely knowledge, skills, and attitude. Therefore, this study aims to explore the assessment practice of EFL lecturers, especially the methods used in assessing the three students’ competencies. It also explores the general assessment practice and examines differences by educational degree and length of teaching experience. This quantitative study relies on survey data from 71 participants joining the EFL lecturers’ association in Indonesia. Furthermore, the convenient sampling technique was used to determine the sample, and the data were analyzed using SPSS version 24. The results showed that the lecturers employed various methods in assessing the three domains of students’ competencies. It was also found that the lecturers mostly employed observation (66.2%) for assessing attitudes domain, tests (33.8%) for assessing knowledge, and work performance (29.6%) for skills. The findings demonstrated that the lecturers have followed the assessment policy of the government related to the method, purpose, instrumentation, procedure, and reporting grade. The results also showed no differences in the assessment practice between lecturers with Master and Doctoral degrees. Additionally, there was no difference among the four categories of teaching experiences in the assessment practice. These findings are expected to become a reference for lecturers and curriculum development in conducting and designing appropriate assessments to guarantee teaching and learning quality.","PeriodicalId":186555,"journal":{"name":"REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v4i3.11005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Within the context of Indonesian higher education, the assessment focuses on the three domains of students’ competencies, namely knowledge, skills, and attitude. Therefore, this study aims to explore the assessment practice of EFL lecturers, especially the methods used in assessing the three students’ competencies. It also explores the general assessment practice and examines differences by educational degree and length of teaching experience. This quantitative study relies on survey data from 71 participants joining the EFL lecturers’ association in Indonesia. Furthermore, the convenient sampling technique was used to determine the sample, and the data were analyzed using SPSS version 24. The results showed that the lecturers employed various methods in assessing the three domains of students’ competencies. It was also found that the lecturers mostly employed observation (66.2%) for assessing attitudes domain, tests (33.8%) for assessing knowledge, and work performance (29.6%) for skills. The findings demonstrated that the lecturers have followed the assessment policy of the government related to the method, purpose, instrumentation, procedure, and reporting grade. The results also showed no differences in the assessment practice between lecturers with Master and Doctoral degrees. Additionally, there was no difference among the four categories of teaching experiences in the assessment practice. These findings are expected to become a reference for lecturers and curriculum development in conducting and designing appropriate assessments to guarantee teaching and learning quality.
当前课程实施下的英语讲师课堂评估实践:政策与实践的结合
在印尼高等教育的背景下,评估侧重于学生能力的三个领域,即知识、技能和态度。因此,本研究旨在探讨英语讲师的评估实践,特别是评估这三位学生能力的方法。它还探讨了一般的评估实践,并检查了教育程度和教学经验长度的差异。这项定量研究依赖于71名印度尼西亚英语讲师协会参与者的调查数据。采用方便抽样法确定样本,数据采用SPSS 24进行分析。结果显示,讲师在评估学生能力的三个领域时采用了不同的方法。调查还发现,教师在态度评估领域多采用观察法(66.2%),知识评估领域多采用测验法(33.8%),技能评估领域多采用工作绩效法(29.6%)。调查结果表明,讲师在评估方法、目的、工具、程序和报告等级方面遵循了政府的评估政策。研究结果还显示,硕士和博士学位讲师的评估实践没有差异。此外,在评估实践中,四类教学经验之间没有差异。期望这些研究结果能成为讲师和课程开发人员进行和设计适当评估的参考,以保证教与学的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信