Red Cell Distribution Width and Its Association with Neonatal Bacteremia: A Case-Control Study

Hashima Diamla, Robert Garcia
{"title":"Red Cell Distribution Width and Its Association with Neonatal Bacteremia: A Case-Control Study","authors":"Hashima Diamla, Robert Garcia","doi":"10.56964/pidspj20222301008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bacteremia is a major cause of prolonged hospital stay and mortality in neonates and its early diagnosis remains a challenge to pediatricians. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is a component of a complete blood count test which is accessible and inexpensive and has been reported to be a possible diagnostic marker for neonatal bacteremia. This study determined the association of RDW with neonatal bacteremia in term and preterm neonates. Methodology: This is a retrospective case-control study of 26 bacteremic neonates as cases and 104 non-bacteremic neonates, either symptomatic or with risk factors for bacteremia, as controls. Included newborns were seen between January 1, 2010 to September 30, 2021. Laboratory data obtained were CBC, C-reactive protein and blood culture. Results: RDW values between bacteremic and non-bacteremic neonates were not significantly different. There was an association between RDW and neonatal bacteremia at an RDW level of > 16.1, where the likelihood of bacteremia was three times higher compared with lower RDW values. Significantly lower levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC count, WBC count, platelet count, MCH and MCHC, and a higher CRP level were seen among bacteremic neonates compared to those who were not. The median RDW for both term and preterm neonates was close to 16, with a narrow inter-quartile range at 1 and 2 for controls and cases, respectively. The range (minimum to maximum) of RDW values of bacteremic preterm neonates was more variable than those of term neonates. Using RDW to detect bacteremia, it had an equivocal discriminatory power or AUC of 0.6056. We found insufficient evidence to demonstrate a correlation between RDW and other CBC parameters, except for MCHC. For MCHC, the results suggest a very weak and indirect correlation. Conclusion: RDW was not significantly different between bacteremic and non-bacteremic neonates, but there was a suggested association between RDW and bacteremia at an RDW level of > 16.1, at which level there was a 3-fold risk for bacteremia.","PeriodicalId":117545,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56964/pidspj20222301008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bacteremia is a major cause of prolonged hospital stay and mortality in neonates and its early diagnosis remains a challenge to pediatricians. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is a component of a complete blood count test which is accessible and inexpensive and has been reported to be a possible diagnostic marker for neonatal bacteremia. This study determined the association of RDW with neonatal bacteremia in term and preterm neonates. Methodology: This is a retrospective case-control study of 26 bacteremic neonates as cases and 104 non-bacteremic neonates, either symptomatic or with risk factors for bacteremia, as controls. Included newborns were seen between January 1, 2010 to September 30, 2021. Laboratory data obtained were CBC, C-reactive protein and blood culture. Results: RDW values between bacteremic and non-bacteremic neonates were not significantly different. There was an association between RDW and neonatal bacteremia at an RDW level of > 16.1, where the likelihood of bacteremia was three times higher compared with lower RDW values. Significantly lower levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC count, WBC count, platelet count, MCH and MCHC, and a higher CRP level were seen among bacteremic neonates compared to those who were not. The median RDW for both term and preterm neonates was close to 16, with a narrow inter-quartile range at 1 and 2 for controls and cases, respectively. The range (minimum to maximum) of RDW values of bacteremic preterm neonates was more variable than those of term neonates. Using RDW to detect bacteremia, it had an equivocal discriminatory power or AUC of 0.6056. We found insufficient evidence to demonstrate a correlation between RDW and other CBC parameters, except for MCHC. For MCHC, the results suggest a very weak and indirect correlation. Conclusion: RDW was not significantly different between bacteremic and non-bacteremic neonates, but there was a suggested association between RDW and bacteremia at an RDW level of > 16.1, at which level there was a 3-fold risk for bacteremia.
红细胞分布宽度及其与新生儿菌血症的关系:一项病例对照研究
背景:菌血症是新生儿住院时间延长和死亡的主要原因,其早期诊断对儿科医生来说仍然是一个挑战。红细胞分布宽度(RDW)是全血细胞计数测试的一个组成部分,易于获得且价格低廉,据报道可能是新生儿菌血症的诊断标志。本研究确定了RDW与足月和早产儿新生儿菌血症的关系。方法:这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,26例菌血症新生儿作为病例,104例非菌血症新生儿,有症状或有菌血症危险因素作为对照。纳入的新生儿在2010年1月1日至2021年9月30日期间就诊。实验室数据为CBC、c反应蛋白和血培养。结果:菌血症新生儿和非菌血症新生儿的RDW值无显著差异。RDW值> 16.1时,RDW与新生儿菌血症之间存在关联,与RDW值较低时相比,发生菌血症的可能性高出三倍。与未感染菌血症的新生儿相比,感染菌血症新生儿的血红蛋白、红细胞压积、红细胞计数、白细胞计数、血小板计数、MCH和MCHC水平明显降低,而CRP水平较高。足月新生儿和早产儿的中位RDW接近16,对照组和病例的四分位数范围分别为1和2。细菌血症早产儿的RDW值范围(最小值到最大值)比足月新生儿变化更大。使用RDW检测菌血症,其鉴别能力或AUC为0.6056。我们没有找到足够的证据来证明RDW与除MCHC外的其他CBC参数之间的相关性。对于MCHC,结果表明存在非常弱的间接相关性。结论:RDW在菌血症和非菌血症新生儿之间无显著差异,但RDW > 16.1时提示RDW与菌血症存在关联,在该水平时发生菌血症的风险为3倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信