Public Facebook Groups for Political Activism

M. Sanfilippo, K. Strandburg
{"title":"Public Facebook Groups for Political Activism","authors":"M. Sanfilippo, K. Strandburg","doi":"10.1017/9781108749978.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of social media has raised questions about the vitality of privacy values and concerns about threats to privacy. The convergence of politics with social media use amplifies the privacy concerns traditionally associated with political organizing, particularly when marginalized groups and minority politics are involved. Despite the importance of these issues, there has been little empirical exploration of how privacy governs political activism and organizing in online environments. This project explores how privacy concerns shape political organizing on Facebook, through detailed case studies of how groups associated with March for Science, Day Without Immigrants (“DWI”), and Women’s March govern information flows. This comparative case study employs an empirical framework that we developed in earlier work, in which we synthesized contextual integrity analysis with the Governing Knowledge Commons (GKC) framework for institutional analysis of commons governance of knowledge. These cases, addressing distinct issues, while operating in similar contexts and on the same timescales, thus allow for the exploration of privacy, as it plays out through governance of personal information flows, for both political organizing and Facebook sub-communities. Privacy practices and concerns differed between the cases, depending on factors such as the nature of the group, the political issues it confronts, and its relationships to other organizations or movements.","PeriodicalId":131710,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Group Dynamics eJournal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Group Dynamics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108749978.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The rise of social media has raised questions about the vitality of privacy values and concerns about threats to privacy. The convergence of politics with social media use amplifies the privacy concerns traditionally associated with political organizing, particularly when marginalized groups and minority politics are involved. Despite the importance of these issues, there has been little empirical exploration of how privacy governs political activism and organizing in online environments. This project explores how privacy concerns shape political organizing on Facebook, through detailed case studies of how groups associated with March for Science, Day Without Immigrants (“DWI”), and Women’s March govern information flows. This comparative case study employs an empirical framework that we developed in earlier work, in which we synthesized contextual integrity analysis with the Governing Knowledge Commons (GKC) framework for institutional analysis of commons governance of knowledge. These cases, addressing distinct issues, while operating in similar contexts and on the same timescales, thus allow for the exploration of privacy, as it plays out through governance of personal information flows, for both political organizing and Facebook sub-communities. Privacy practices and concerns differed between the cases, depending on factors such as the nature of the group, the political issues it confronts, and its relationships to other organizations or movements.
公开的Facebook政治行动团体
社交媒体的兴起引发了人们对隐私价值观生命力的质疑,以及对隐私受到威胁的担忧。政治与社交媒体使用的融合放大了传统上与政治组织相关的隐私问题,特别是当涉及边缘化群体和少数群体政治时。尽管这些问题很重要,但很少有关于隐私如何管理在线环境中的政治活动和组织的实证探索。本项目通过详细的案例研究,探讨隐私问题如何影响Facebook上的政治组织,包括“科学游行”、“无移民日”(DWI)和“妇女游行”等组织如何管理信息流。本比较案例研究采用了我们在早期工作中开发的经验框架,在该框架中,我们将上下文完整性分析与治理知识共享(GKC)框架综合起来,用于对知识共享治理进行制度分析。这些案例解决了不同的问题,同时在相似的背景和相同的时间尺度上运作,从而允许对隐私的探索,因为它通过对政治组织和Facebook子社区的个人信息流的治理来发挥作用。在不同的案例中,隐私实践和关注点有所不同,这取决于组织的性质、面临的政治问题以及与其他组织或运动的关系等因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信