{"title":"Scripture and Interpretive Method: Why Read Scripture as Canon?","authors":"Ken Stenstrup","doi":"10.1177/014610790303300405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the practical benefits of interpreting Scripture as a composite or collection. Based upon Comparative Midrash and Intertextuality, the work of James A. Sanders suggests most fundamentally that Scripture can serve as a paradigm for how one understands the divine working through the world. The study provides a brief overview of this method and then through a critical assessment presents general implications that result from employing the method.","PeriodicalId":227137,"journal":{"name":"Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/014610790303300405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This article presents the practical benefits of interpreting Scripture as a composite or collection. Based upon Comparative Midrash and Intertextuality, the work of James A. Sanders suggests most fundamentally that Scripture can serve as a paradigm for how one understands the divine working through the world. The study provides a brief overview of this method and then through a critical assessment presents general implications that result from employing the method.
这篇文章介绍了把《圣经》解释为合集或合集的实际好处。基于《比较米德拉什》和《互文性》,詹姆斯·a·桑德斯(James a . Sanders)的作品最根本的建议是,《圣经》可以作为一个范例,用于人们如何理解上帝在世界上的工作。该研究提供了该方法的简要概述,然后通过批判性评估提出了采用该方法的一般含义。