Online self-regulated learning, academic performance, and well-being of Senior High School Students in the NCR: A mediation analysis

Alvin Nieva, Josephine Prudente
{"title":"Online self-regulated learning, academic performance, and well-being of Senior High School Students in the NCR: A mediation analysis","authors":"Alvin Nieva, Josephine Prudente","doi":"10.58870/berj.v7i1.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Philippines abruptly shifted from traditional to emergency remote education in response to the threats brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic. Emergency remote education is an umbrella term to refer to online learning. Literature on traditional learning suggests that selfregulation correlates positively with well-being, which suggests that students who are autonomous in their learning activities tend to be satisfied with their lives. Research also suggests that academic performance mediates this relationship, which suggests that students tend to become satisfied with their lives when they achieve successful learning outcomes. This research explores the relationship between online self-regulation, academic performance, and well-being of 379 senior high school students from selected public and private schools who hold classes using the online learning modality in the National Capital Region (NCR) using a quantitative approach specifically the explanatory cross-sectional design. The participants completed the online survey on self-regulated learning and well-being (i.e., Online Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire and Satisfaction With Life Scale), while their academic performance was based on their self-reported third quarter grade point average. Results showed that online self-regulated learning predicted well-being, however, academic performance did not mediate the positive relationship between online self-regulated learning and well-being. Our findings suggest that, in the context of online learning, senior high school students who regulate their learning may experience satisfaction with their lives even if they do not achieve academic success.ReferencesAppana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal of E-Learning, 7(1), 5–22.Bailey, T. H., & Phillips, L. J. (2016). The influence of motivation and adaptation on students' subjective well-being, meaning in life, and academic performance. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Decision Process, 50, 248–287.Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005Barnard, L., Paton, V., & Lan, W. (2008). Mediator in the relationship between online course perceptions with achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–11.Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., … Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878572Demming, C. L., Jahn, S., & Boztug, Y. (2017). Conducting mediation analysis in marketing research. Marketing ZFP, 39(3), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-76Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.Firoozabadi, A., Uitdewilligen, S., & Zijlstra, F. R. H. (2018). Solving problems or seeing troubles? A day-level study on the consequences of thinking about work on recovery and well-being, and the moderating role of selfregulation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(5), 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1505720Hayes, A. F. (2018). Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Hofer, J., Busch, H., & Kartner, J. (2011). Self-regulation and well-being: The influence of identity and motives. European Journal of Personality, 25(3), 211–224.Johnson, B. (2001). Toward a new classification of nonexperimental quantitative research. Educational Researcher, 30(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030002003`Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. B. (2020). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6 ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.Li, J., Ye, H., Tang, Y., Zhou, Z., & Hu, X. (2018). What are the effects of selfregulation phases and strategies for Chinese students? A meta-analysis of two decades of research on the association between self-regulation and academic performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(DEC), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02434Morosanova, V. I., Fomina, T. G., & Bondarenko, I. N. (2021). The dynamics of the interrelationships between conscious self-regulation, psychological well-being and school-related subjective well-being in adolescents : A three-year cross-lagged panel study. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 14(3), 34–49.Nima, A. Al, Cloninger, K. M., Persson, B. N., Sikström, S., & Garcia, D. (2020). Validation of subjective well-being measures using Item Response Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(January), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03036Park, C. L., Edmondson, D., & Lee, J. (2012). Development of self-regulation abilities as predictors of psychological adjustment across the first year of college. Journal of Adult Development, 19(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-011-9133-zPelikan, E. R., Lüftenegger, M., Holzer, J., Korlat, S., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2021). Learning during COVID-19: the role of self-regulated learning, motivation, and procrastination for perceived competence. Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(2), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01002-xPopescu, E. F., Tătucu, M., & Dobromirescu, V. (2021). Students ’ well-being in online education in Covid-19 context. International Journal of Educational and Research, 9(2), 1–10.Rotas, E. E., & Cahapay, M. B. (2020). Difficulties in Remote Learning: Voices of Philippine University Students in the Wake of COVID-19 Crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 147–158. Retrieved from keywords: difficulties, remote learning, university students, COVID-19 crisis, PhilippinesSanchez, E., & Buddin, R. (2016). How accurate are self-reported high school courses, course grades, and grade point average? (ACT research report series 2016 [3]). 2016(3). http://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/5269-research-report-how-accurate-are-selfreported-hs-courses.pdfSheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1998). Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1319–1331.Tian, L., Wang, D., & Huebner, E. S. (2015). Development and validation of the brief adolescents’ subjective well-being in school scale (BASWBSS). Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0603-0Wang, H., Yang, J., & Li, P. (2021). How and when goal-oriented self-regulation improves college students’ well-being: A weekly diary study. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01288-wWidodo, A., Nursaptini, N., Novitasari, S., Sutisna, D., & Umar, U. (2020). From face-to-face learning to web base learning: How are student readiness? Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v10i2.6801","PeriodicalId":439426,"journal":{"name":"Bedan Research Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bedan Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58870/berj.v7i1.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Philippines abruptly shifted from traditional to emergency remote education in response to the threats brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic. Emergency remote education is an umbrella term to refer to online learning. Literature on traditional learning suggests that selfregulation correlates positively with well-being, which suggests that students who are autonomous in their learning activities tend to be satisfied with their lives. Research also suggests that academic performance mediates this relationship, which suggests that students tend to become satisfied with their lives when they achieve successful learning outcomes. This research explores the relationship between online self-regulation, academic performance, and well-being of 379 senior high school students from selected public and private schools who hold classes using the online learning modality in the National Capital Region (NCR) using a quantitative approach specifically the explanatory cross-sectional design. The participants completed the online survey on self-regulated learning and well-being (i.e., Online Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire and Satisfaction With Life Scale), while their academic performance was based on their self-reported third quarter grade point average. Results showed that online self-regulated learning predicted well-being, however, academic performance did not mediate the positive relationship between online self-regulated learning and well-being. Our findings suggest that, in the context of online learning, senior high school students who regulate their learning may experience satisfaction with their lives even if they do not achieve academic success.ReferencesAppana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal of E-Learning, 7(1), 5–22.Bailey, T. H., & Phillips, L. J. (2016). The influence of motivation and adaptation on students' subjective well-being, meaning in life, and academic performance. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Decision Process, 50, 248–287.Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005Barnard, L., Paton, V., & Lan, W. (2008). Mediator in the relationship between online course perceptions with achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–11.Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., … Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878572Demming, C. L., Jahn, S., & Boztug, Y. (2017). Conducting mediation analysis in marketing research. Marketing ZFP, 39(3), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-76Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.Firoozabadi, A., Uitdewilligen, S., & Zijlstra, F. R. H. (2018). Solving problems or seeing troubles? A day-level study on the consequences of thinking about work on recovery and well-being, and the moderating role of selfregulation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(5), 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1505720Hayes, A. F. (2018). Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Hofer, J., Busch, H., & Kartner, J. (2011). Self-regulation and well-being: The influence of identity and motives. European Journal of Personality, 25(3), 211–224.Johnson, B. (2001). Toward a new classification of nonexperimental quantitative research. Educational Researcher, 30(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030002003`Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. B. (2020). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6 ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.Li, J., Ye, H., Tang, Y., Zhou, Z., & Hu, X. (2018). What are the effects of selfregulation phases and strategies for Chinese students? A meta-analysis of two decades of research on the association between self-regulation and academic performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(DEC), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02434Morosanova, V. I., Fomina, T. G., & Bondarenko, I. N. (2021). The dynamics of the interrelationships between conscious self-regulation, psychological well-being and school-related subjective well-being in adolescents : A three-year cross-lagged panel study. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 14(3), 34–49.Nima, A. Al, Cloninger, K. M., Persson, B. N., Sikström, S., & Garcia, D. (2020). Validation of subjective well-being measures using Item Response Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(January), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03036Park, C. L., Edmondson, D., & Lee, J. (2012). Development of self-regulation abilities as predictors of psychological adjustment across the first year of college. Journal of Adult Development, 19(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-011-9133-zPelikan, E. R., Lüftenegger, M., Holzer, J., Korlat, S., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2021). Learning during COVID-19: the role of self-regulated learning, motivation, and procrastination for perceived competence. Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(2), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01002-xPopescu, E. F., Tătucu, M., & Dobromirescu, V. (2021). Students ’ well-being in online education in Covid-19 context. International Journal of Educational and Research, 9(2), 1–10.Rotas, E. E., & Cahapay, M. B. (2020). Difficulties in Remote Learning: Voices of Philippine University Students in the Wake of COVID-19 Crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 147–158. Retrieved from keywords: difficulties, remote learning, university students, COVID-19 crisis, PhilippinesSanchez, E., & Buddin, R. (2016). How accurate are self-reported high school courses, course grades, and grade point average? (ACT research report series 2016 [3]). 2016(3). http://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/5269-research-report-how-accurate-are-selfreported-hs-courses.pdfSheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1998). Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1319–1331.Tian, L., Wang, D., & Huebner, E. S. (2015). Development and validation of the brief adolescents’ subjective well-being in school scale (BASWBSS). Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0603-0Wang, H., Yang, J., & Li, P. (2021). How and when goal-oriented self-regulation improves college students’ well-being: A weekly diary study. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01288-wWidodo, A., Nursaptini, N., Novitasari, S., Sutisna, D., & Umar, U. (2020). From face-to-face learning to web base learning: How are student readiness? Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v10i2.6801
NCR高中生网络自律学习、学业成绩与幸福感:一个中介分析
为应对COVID-19大流行带来的威胁,菲律宾突然从传统的远程教育转向紧急远程教育。紧急远程教育是在线学习的总称。关于传统学习的文献表明,自我调节与幸福感呈正相关,这表明在学习活动中自主的学生往往对自己的生活感到满意。研究还表明,学习成绩在这种关系中起中介作用,这表明当学生取得成功的学习成果时,他们往往会对自己的生活感到满意。本研究采用定量方法,特别是解释截面设计,探讨了379名在国家首都地区(NCR)使用在线学习模式上课的公立和私立高中学生的网络自律、学习成绩和幸福感之间的关系。参与者完成了关于自我调节学习和幸福感的在线调查(即在线自我调节学习问卷和生活满意度量表),而他们的学习成绩是基于他们自我报告的第三季度平均成绩。结果表明,网络自我调节学习对幸福感有预测作用,但学业成绩在网络自我调节学习与幸福感之间没有中介作用。我们的研究结果表明,在网络学习的背景下,规范学习的高中生即使没有取得学业上的成功,也可能会对他们的生活感到满意。参考文献a . a . S.(2008)。在学生、教师和终身教职人员的背景下,对在线学习的好处和局限性的回顾。国际电子学习学报,7(1),5-22。贝利,t.h.,菲利普斯,l.j.(2016)。动机和适应对学生主观幸福感、生活意义和学业成绩的影响。高等教育研究与发展,35(2),201-216。https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474Bandura, A.(1991)。自我调节的社会认知理论。组织行为与决策过程的关系研究,2011,31(4):444 - 444。巴纳德,L,局域网,w . Y。,,Y,佩顿,v . O。s . L . & Lai(2009)。衡量在线和混合学习环境中的自我调节。网络与高等教育,12(1),1 - 6。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005Barnard, L.,帕顿,V.,和兰,W.(2008)。网络课程感知与成绩关系的中介。开放与远程教育的国际研究综述,9(2),1-11。Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., vladimir, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G.,…Paskevicius, M.(2020)。2019冠状病毒病大流行导致教育中断的全球展望:在不确定和危机时期导航。远程教育学报,15(1),1 - 126。https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878572Demming, c.l, Jahn, S., & Boztug, Y.(2017)。在市场调研中进行中介分析。市场营销,39(3),76-98。https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-76Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S.(1985)。生活满意度量表。心理学报,2009(1),41 - 41。Firoozabadi, A., Uitdewilligen, S.和Zijlstra, F. R. H.(2018)。解决问题还是发现麻烦?关于思考工作对恢复和幸福的影响,以及自我调节的调节作用的一天水平研究。心理学报,27(5),629-641。https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1505720Hayes, a.f.(2018)。调解、调节和条件过程分析:基于回归的方法(第2版)。纽约:吉尔福德出版社。Hofer, J., Busch, H., & Kartner, J.(2011)。自我调节与幸福感:身份和动机的影响。心理学杂志,25(3),211-224。约翰逊,B.(2001)。非实验定量研究的新分类。教育研究,30(2),3-13。https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030002003’Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. B.(2020)。教育研究:定量、定性和混合方法(6版)。李军,叶辉,唐勇,周忠,胡晓明(2018)。自我调节阶段和策略对中国学生的影响是什么?对自我调节与学习成绩之间关系的二十年研究的荟萃分析。心理学前沿,9(12),1-13。https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02434Morosanova, v.i, Fomina, t.g., and Bondarenko, i.n.(2021)。青少年有意识自我调节、心理健康和学校相关主观幸福感的相互关系动态:一项为期三年的交叉滞后面板研究。俄罗斯心理学:最新进展,14(3),34-49。Nima, A. Al, Cloninger, K. M, Persson, B. N., Sikström, S。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信