NUMERICAL STUDY COMPARING THE INCIDENCE INFLUENCE BETWEEN REALISTIC WAVE AND REGULAR WAVE OVER AN OVERTOPPING DEVICE

R. G. Hübner, P. Oleinik, W. C. Marques, M. N. Gomes, E. D. Santos, B. N. Machado, L. Isoldi
{"title":"NUMERICAL STUDY COMPARING THE INCIDENCE INFLUENCE BETWEEN REALISTIC WAVE AND REGULAR WAVE OVER AN OVERTOPPING DEVICE","authors":"R. G. Hübner, P. Oleinik, W. C. Marques, M. N. Gomes, E. D. Santos, B. N. Machado, L. Isoldi","doi":"10.5380/RETERM.V18I1.67047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work presents a numerical study to evaluate the difference between the fluid dynamic behavior of an overtopping device subjected to the incidence of a realistic wave when compared to a regular one; being this regular wave representative of the considered realistic sea state. To do so, the FLUENT software was employed, which is a Computational Fluid Dynamics package based on the Finite Volume Method. The regular wave was generated through a User Defined Function (UDF) that imposes its velocities components as boundary conditions of prescribed velocity. On the other hand, for the realistic wave it was used a methodology to impose the realistic components velocities from transient discrete values, named Table Data (TD) in FLUENT software. For both cases the Volume of Fluid (VOF) multiphase model was applied in the treatment of the water-air interaction. The results showed that the amount of water accumulated in the reservoir for the realistic sea state was 2.46 higher than for the regular wave. This is a relevant finding, since several researches about Overtopping device efficiency were promoted considering only the incidence of regular wave.","PeriodicalId":106768,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Engenharia Térmica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Engenharia Térmica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/RETERM.V18I1.67047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This work presents a numerical study to evaluate the difference between the fluid dynamic behavior of an overtopping device subjected to the incidence of a realistic wave when compared to a regular one; being this regular wave representative of the considered realistic sea state. To do so, the FLUENT software was employed, which is a Computational Fluid Dynamics package based on the Finite Volume Method. The regular wave was generated through a User Defined Function (UDF) that imposes its velocities components as boundary conditions of prescribed velocity. On the other hand, for the realistic wave it was used a methodology to impose the realistic components velocities from transient discrete values, named Table Data (TD) in FLUENT software. For both cases the Volume of Fluid (VOF) multiphase model was applied in the treatment of the water-air interaction. The results showed that the amount of water accumulated in the reservoir for the realistic sea state was 2.46 higher than for the regular wave. This is a relevant finding, since several researches about Overtopping device efficiency were promoted considering only the incidence of regular wave.
超顶装置上实波与规则波入射影响的数值比较研究
这项工作提出了一个数值研究,以评估在实际波的入射下,与常规波相比,过顶装置的流体动力学行为之间的差异;作为这种规则的波浪代表被认为是现实的海况。为此,使用了FLUENT软件,这是一个基于有限体积法的计算流体动力学软件包。规则波是通过用户定义函数(UDF)产生的,该函数将其速度分量作为规定速度的边界条件。另一方面,对于真实波,采用了一种从瞬态离散值中施加真实分量速度的方法,在FLUENT软件中称为表数据(TD)。对于这两种情况,流体体积(VOF)多相模型用于处理水-空气相互作用。结果表明,实际海况下水库蓄水量比正常海浪高2.46。这是一个相关的发现,因为一些关于Overtopping装置效率的研究只考虑了规则波的入射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信