Thinking, checking and learning: testing a moderated-mediation model of social media news use conditional upon elaboration on political knowledge via fact-checking

Bumsoo Kim, Eric J. Cooks, Yonghwan Kim
{"title":"Thinking, checking and learning: testing a moderated-mediation model of social media news use conditional upon elaboration on political knowledge via fact-checking","authors":"Bumsoo Kim, Eric J. Cooks, Yonghwan Kim","doi":"10.1108/oir-12-2020-0584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeEmploying the cognitive mediation model, the study aims to examine a moderated-mediation mechanism of social media news use contingent upon elaboration on political knowledge through fact-checking – specifically, the interaction effect of social media news with elaboration on fact-checking.Design/methodology/approachThe moderated-mediation model is tested using panel survey data collected during the 2016 USA presidential election (N = 1,624 at Wave 1; N = 637 at Wave 2).FindingsThe findings reveal that social media news users are frequent visitors of fact-checking websites. Results also suggest that those with increased social media news use and cognitive elaboration on news content are more likely to visit fact-checking sites, which contributes to increased political knowledge.Originality/valueThe results of the current study, especially in the era of social media environment where various information is overflowing, suggest an important role of individuals' responsibility as democratic citizens given that people's cognitive elaboration and surveillance efforts, which tries to think about important public issues they consume through media, could strengthen a positive pathway toward informed citizens.","PeriodicalId":143302,"journal":{"name":"Online Inf. Rev.","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Inf. Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-12-2020-0584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

PurposeEmploying the cognitive mediation model, the study aims to examine a moderated-mediation mechanism of social media news use contingent upon elaboration on political knowledge through fact-checking – specifically, the interaction effect of social media news with elaboration on fact-checking.Design/methodology/approachThe moderated-mediation model is tested using panel survey data collected during the 2016 USA presidential election (N = 1,624 at Wave 1; N = 637 at Wave 2).FindingsThe findings reveal that social media news users are frequent visitors of fact-checking websites. Results also suggest that those with increased social media news use and cognitive elaboration on news content are more likely to visit fact-checking sites, which contributes to increased political knowledge.Originality/valueThe results of the current study, especially in the era of social media environment where various information is overflowing, suggest an important role of individuals' responsibility as democratic citizens given that people's cognitive elaboration and surveillance efforts, which tries to think about important public issues they consume through media, could strengthen a positive pathway toward informed citizens.
思考、检查与学习:通过事实检查检验以政治知识阐述为条件的社交媒体新闻使用的有调节中介模型
目的运用认知中介模型,通过事实核查考察政治知识阐述对社交媒体新闻使用的调节中介机制,即社交媒体新闻与事实核查阐述的交互效应。设计/方法/方法使用2016年美国总统大选期间收集的面板调查数据对有调节的中介模型进行检验(N = 1,624;(N = 637 at Wave 2)研究结果发现,社交媒体新闻用户是事实核查网站的常客。研究结果还表明,那些更多地使用社交媒体新闻和对新闻内容进行认知阐述的人更有可能访问事实核查网站,这有助于增加政治知识。独创性/价值当前研究的结果,特别是在各种信息泛滥的社交媒体环境时代,表明个人作为民主公民的责任具有重要作用,因为人们的认知阐述和监督努力,试图思考他们通过媒体消费的重要公共问题,可以加强通往知情公民的积极途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信