Bridging the Computer Science -- Law Divide: Recommendations from the Front Lines

Azer Bestavros, Stacey L. Dogan, Paul Ohm, A. Sellars
{"title":"Bridging the Computer Science -- Law Divide: Recommendations from the Front Lines","authors":"Azer Bestavros, Stacey L. Dogan, Paul Ohm, A. Sellars","doi":"10.1145/3511265.3550497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many pressing societal questions can be answered only by bringing experts from different disciplines together. Questions around misinformation and disinformation, platform power, surveillance capitalism, information privacy, and algorithmic bias, among many others, reside at the intersection of computer science and law. We need to develop institutions that bring together computer scientists and legal scholars to work together on issues like these, and to train new innovators, thought leaders, counselors, and policymakers with hybrid training in both disciplines. In Universities, the disciplines of Computer Science (CS) and Law are separated by many wide chasms. Differences in standards, language, methods, and culture impede professors and other academic researchers who want to collaborate with colleagues on the other side of this divide. Universities place CS and Law in different schools, on different campuses, on different calendars, etc. Researchers in the two disciplines face differing incentives and reward structures for publishing, teaching, funding, and service.","PeriodicalId":254114,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 Symposium on Computer Science and Law","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 Symposium on Computer Science and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3511265.3550497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many pressing societal questions can be answered only by bringing experts from different disciplines together. Questions around misinformation and disinformation, platform power, surveillance capitalism, information privacy, and algorithmic bias, among many others, reside at the intersection of computer science and law. We need to develop institutions that bring together computer scientists and legal scholars to work together on issues like these, and to train new innovators, thought leaders, counselors, and policymakers with hybrid training in both disciplines. In Universities, the disciplines of Computer Science (CS) and Law are separated by many wide chasms. Differences in standards, language, methods, and culture impede professors and other academic researchers who want to collaborate with colleagues on the other side of this divide. Universities place CS and Law in different schools, on different campuses, on different calendars, etc. Researchers in the two disciplines face differing incentives and reward structures for publishing, teaching, funding, and service.
弥合计算机科学与法律的鸿沟:来自第一线的建议
只有把不同学科的专家聚集在一起,才能解决许多紧迫的社会问题。关于错误信息和虚假信息、平台权力、监控资本主义、信息隐私和算法偏见等问题,存在于计算机科学和法律的交叉点。我们需要建立一些机构,将计算机科学家和法律学者聚集在一起,共同研究这些问题,并通过这两个学科的混合培训培养新的创新者、思想领袖、顾问和政策制定者。在大学里,计算机科学(CS)和法学(Law)两门学科被许多鸿沟分开。标准、语言、方法和文化的差异阻碍了教授和其他学术研究人员想要与这一鸿沟另一端的同事合作。大学把计算机科学和法律放在不同的学校、不同的校园、不同的日历上等等。两个学科的研究人员在出版、教学、资助和服务方面面临不同的激励和奖励结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信