ANDROID APPLICATIONS MALWARE DETECTION: A Comparative Analysis of some Classification Algorithms

Oluwaseyi Olorunshola, Ayanfeoluwa Oluyomi
{"title":"ANDROID APPLICATIONS MALWARE DETECTION: A Comparative Analysis of some Classification Algorithms","authors":"Oluwaseyi Olorunshola, Ayanfeoluwa Oluyomi","doi":"10.1109/ICECCO48375.2019.9043284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The usage of the Android Operating System (OS) has surpassed all other operating systems and as a result, it has become the primary target of attackers. Many attacks can be geared towards Android phones mainly using application installation. These third-party applications first seek permission from the user before installation. Some of the permissions can be elusive evading the users’ attention. With the type of harm that can be done which include illegal extraction and transfer of the users’ data, spying on the users and so on there is a need to have a heuristic approach in the detection of malware. In this research work, some classification algorithms were tested to determine the best performing algorithm when it comes to the detection of android malware detection. An android application dataset was obtained from figshare and used in the Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) for training and testing, it was measured under accuracy, false-positive rate, precision, recall, f-measure, Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). It was discovered that multi-layer perceptron performs best with an accuracy of 99.4%.","PeriodicalId":166322,"journal":{"name":"2019 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO)","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCO48375.2019.9043284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The usage of the Android Operating System (OS) has surpassed all other operating systems and as a result, it has become the primary target of attackers. Many attacks can be geared towards Android phones mainly using application installation. These third-party applications first seek permission from the user before installation. Some of the permissions can be elusive evading the users’ attention. With the type of harm that can be done which include illegal extraction and transfer of the users’ data, spying on the users and so on there is a need to have a heuristic approach in the detection of malware. In this research work, some classification algorithms were tested to determine the best performing algorithm when it comes to the detection of android malware detection. An android application dataset was obtained from figshare and used in the Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) for training and testing, it was measured under accuracy, false-positive rate, precision, recall, f-measure, Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). It was discovered that multi-layer perceptron performs best with an accuracy of 99.4%.
ANDROID应用恶意软件检测:几种分类算法的比较分析
安卓操作系统(Android Operating System, OS)的使用率已经超过了其他所有操作系统,因此成为了攻击者的首要目标。许多针对Android手机的攻击主要是利用应用程序安装。这些第三方应用程序在安装前首先需要获得用户的许可。有些权限可能是难以捉摸的,逃避了用户的注意。由于可能造成的危害类型包括非法提取和传输用户数据,监视用户等,因此需要采用启发式方法来检测恶意软件。在本研究工作中,对一些分类算法进行了测试,以确定在检测android恶意软件时表现最好的算法。从figshare获取android应用程序数据集,在Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA)中进行训练和测试,测量准确率、假阳性率、准确率、召回率、f-measure、受试者工作曲线(ROC)和均方根误差(RMSE)。结果表明,多层感知器的准确率最高,达到99.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信