Improved Accuracy in Speech Recognition System for Detection of Covid-19 using K Nearest Neighbour and Comparing with Artificial Neural Network

Rallapalli Jhansi, G. Uganya
{"title":"Improved Accuracy in Speech Recognition System for Detection of Covid-19 using K Nearest Neighbour and Comparing with Artificial Neural Network","authors":"Rallapalli Jhansi, G. Uganya","doi":"10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study focuses on the detection of Covid-19 via the use of cutting-edge speech recognition technology known as K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and comparing its accuracy with that of an Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Both the Materials and the Methods: In this case, speech recognition through the use of KNN is deemed to be group 1, while speech recognition via the use of an artificial neural network is considered to be group 2. ANN is comprised of several different components that are responsible for gathering the input signals and predefined functions that are responsible for creating the output signals. KNN works by calculating the distance between the query and the data and then picking the samples that are geographically closest to the requests. These various samples using algorithms were computationally assessed by a sampling test with 5% of alpha error and 0.95 of confidence interval. The results of this analysis are shown below. The findings show that ANN performs at a level of mean accuracy of 83.5%, whereas KNN performs at a level of mean accuracy of 91.49% with an error significance value of 0.03 (p 0.05). The findings that were acquired using KNN have shown much improved performance in terms of accuracy compared to those obtained using ANN.","PeriodicalId":436733,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study focuses on the detection of Covid-19 via the use of cutting-edge speech recognition technology known as K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and comparing its accuracy with that of an Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Both the Materials and the Methods: In this case, speech recognition through the use of KNN is deemed to be group 1, while speech recognition via the use of an artificial neural network is considered to be group 2. ANN is comprised of several different components that are responsible for gathering the input signals and predefined functions that are responsible for creating the output signals. KNN works by calculating the distance between the query and the data and then picking the samples that are geographically closest to the requests. These various samples using algorithms were computationally assessed by a sampling test with 5% of alpha error and 0.95 of confidence interval. The results of this analysis are shown below. The findings show that ANN performs at a level of mean accuracy of 83.5%, whereas KNN performs at a level of mean accuracy of 91.49% with an error significance value of 0.03 (p 0.05). The findings that were acquired using KNN have shown much improved performance in terms of accuracy compared to those obtained using ANN.
基于K近邻的新型冠状病毒语音识别系统及其与人工神经网络的比较
目的:本研究的重点是利用被称为K近邻(KNN)的尖端语音识别技术检测Covid-19,并将其与人工神经网络(ANN)的准确率进行比较。材料和方法:在这种情况下,通过使用KNN进行语音识别被认为是第一组,而通过使用人工神经网络进行语音识别被认为是第二组。人工神经网络由几个不同的组件组成,这些组件负责收集输入信号,而预定义的函数负责创建输出信号。KNN的工作原理是计算查询和数据之间的距离,然后选择地理上最接近请求的样本。这些使用算法的不同样本通过抽样检验进行计算评估,alpha误差为5%,置信区间为0.95。分析的结果如下所示。结果表明,ANN的平均准确率为83.5%,而KNN的平均准确率为91.49%,误差显著性值为0.03 (p 0.05)。与使用人工神经网络获得的结果相比,使用KNN获得的结果在准确性方面表现出了很大的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信