Cystic duct identification in laparoscopic cholecystectomy review articles

Raafat Ahmed Alturfi, A. Hilmi
{"title":"Cystic duct identification in laparoscopic cholecystectomy review articles","authors":"Raafat Ahmed Alturfi, A. Hilmi","doi":"10.4103/SJL.SJL_5_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postcholecystectomy bile duct injury (BDI) is a life-threatening complication; it associated with increased morbidity and mortality in addition to the medicolegal consequences. The most common cause of serious biliary injury is misidentification of cystic duct-common bile duct relationship. Many techniques had been tested by surgeons to avoid the misidentification injury, this include infundibular technique, critical view of safety, retrograde laparoscopic cholecystectomy, operative cholangiography, fluorescence cholangiography, and biliary navigation surgery using endoscopic nasobiliary drainage. Among these methods, critical view of safety (CVS) has been found most reliable and safe method for cystic duct identification. Moreover, it is easy applicable, fast to learn, and not required special equipment. If the CVS cannot be achieved safely, there are others alternative methods to avoid BDI according to SAGES recommendations.","PeriodicalId":388688,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Laparoscopy","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Laparoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/SJL.SJL_5_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postcholecystectomy bile duct injury (BDI) is a life-threatening complication; it associated with increased morbidity and mortality in addition to the medicolegal consequences. The most common cause of serious biliary injury is misidentification of cystic duct-common bile duct relationship. Many techniques had been tested by surgeons to avoid the misidentification injury, this include infundibular technique, critical view of safety, retrograde laparoscopic cholecystectomy, operative cholangiography, fluorescence cholangiography, and biliary navigation surgery using endoscopic nasobiliary drainage. Among these methods, critical view of safety (CVS) has been found most reliable and safe method for cystic duct identification. Moreover, it is easy applicable, fast to learn, and not required special equipment. If the CVS cannot be achieved safely, there are others alternative methods to avoid BDI according to SAGES recommendations.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的胆囊管识别综述文章
胆囊切除术后胆管损伤(BDI)是危及生命的并发症;除了医学上的后果外,它还与发病率和死亡率增加有关。严重胆道损伤最常见的原因是对胆囊管-胆总管关系的错误识别。为了避免误认损伤,外科医生已经试验了许多技术,包括漏斗技术、安全批判观、逆行腹腔镜胆囊切除术、手术胆管造影、荧光胆管造影和内镜下鼻胆道引流胆道导航手术。在这些方法中,安全性批判观(CVS)被认为是最可靠和安全的胆囊管鉴别方法。此外,它易于应用,学习速度快,不需要特殊的设备。如果不能安全地达到CVS,根据SAGES的建议,还有其他替代方法可以避免BDI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信