Transparency

R. Susskind
{"title":"Transparency","authors":"R. Susskind","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198838364.003.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two related and often heartfelt objections to online courts should be disentangled. Both focus on the absence of a physical courtroom. One is that online courts are insufficiently transparent and so an affront to open justice. The other doubts whether it is possible to have a fair trial if the participants do not congregate physically—the worry here is that online courts might deliver decisions that are unfair (a concern about substantive justice) and that the procedures themselves are not fair (which contravenes procedural justice). In this chapter, I address the question of transparency and, in the next, I discuss the fairness of trials that are conducted online.","PeriodicalId":203791,"journal":{"name":"Online Courts and the Future of Justice","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Courts and the Future of Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198838364.003.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two related and often heartfelt objections to online courts should be disentangled. Both focus on the absence of a physical courtroom. One is that online courts are insufficiently transparent and so an affront to open justice. The other doubts whether it is possible to have a fair trial if the participants do not congregate physically—the worry here is that online courts might deliver decisions that are unfair (a concern about substantive justice) and that the procedures themselves are not fair (which contravenes procedural justice). In this chapter, I address the question of transparency and, in the next, I discuss the fairness of trials that are conducted online.
透明度
对网络法院的两个相关且往往发自内心的反对意见应该得到解决。两者都聚焦于没有实体法庭。其一,网上法庭不够透明,因此是对公开司法的侮辱。另一个疑问是,如果参与者不聚集在一起,是否有可能进行公平的审判——这里的担忧是,在线法庭可能会做出不公平的判决(这是对实体正义的担忧),而且程序本身也不公平(这违反了程序正义)。在本章中,我将讨论透明度问题,在下一章中,我将讨论在线审判的公正性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书