Working relationally to promote user participation in welfare services for young disabled children and their families in Iceland

Jóna G. Ingólfsdóttir, Thurídur Jóhannsdóttir, R. Traustadóttir
{"title":"Working relationally to promote user participation in welfare services for young disabled children and their families in Iceland","authors":"Jóna G. Ingólfsdóttir, Thurídur Jóhannsdóttir, R. Traustadóttir","doi":"10.18261/ISSN.2464-4161-2018-01-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the avowed aims of the Icelandic legislation to provide family-centred and inclusive services, families raising disabled children commonly express their experiences of fragmented services provided more on the terms of the service providers than the users. This article is based on data derived from an on-going qualitative multi case-research in three municipalities in Iceland. The aims of the paper are 1) to identify the main contradictions that explain tensions and dilemmas within the service system as experienced by the parents, and 2) to suggest potential solutions for improving practices in accordance with family-centred inclusive policy and enhanced user participation. The cultural-historical activity theory was applied as an analytical framework. Three activities central to the wellbeing of the children and their families were identified as the unit of analysis, and contradictions within the activities were located and classified by following the expansive learning theory. Based on our findings we propose Edwards’s three ‘gardening tools’ of relational practices as innovative and appropriate concepts for the necessary changes needed. By utilising these tools, the disabled children and their families are brought to the forefront and the professionals enhance their expertise in partnership with all stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":165032,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk välfärdsforskning | Nordic Welfare Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk välfärdsforskning | Nordic Welfare Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2464-4161-2018-01-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Despite the avowed aims of the Icelandic legislation to provide family-centred and inclusive services, families raising disabled children commonly express their experiences of fragmented services provided more on the terms of the service providers than the users. This article is based on data derived from an on-going qualitative multi case-research in three municipalities in Iceland. The aims of the paper are 1) to identify the main contradictions that explain tensions and dilemmas within the service system as experienced by the parents, and 2) to suggest potential solutions for improving practices in accordance with family-centred inclusive policy and enhanced user participation. The cultural-historical activity theory was applied as an analytical framework. Three activities central to the wellbeing of the children and their families were identified as the unit of analysis, and contradictions within the activities were located and classified by following the expansive learning theory. Based on our findings we propose Edwards’s three ‘gardening tools’ of relational practices as innovative and appropriate concepts for the necessary changes needed. By utilising these tools, the disabled children and their families are brought to the forefront and the professionals enhance their expertise in partnership with all stakeholders.
相互合作,促进用户参与冰岛残疾儿童及其家庭的福利服务
尽管冰岛立法的公开目标是提供以家庭为中心的包容性服务,但抚养残疾儿童的家庭通常表达了他们的经历,即更多地根据服务提供者而不是用户的条件提供支离破碎的服务。本文基于冰岛三个城市正在进行的定性多案例研究得出的数据。本文的目的是:1)找出导致家长在服务系统中遇到的紧张和困境的主要矛盾;2)根据以家庭为中心的包容性政策和增强用户参与,提出改进实践的潜在解决方案。以文化历史活动理论作为分析框架。三个对儿童及其家庭幸福至关重要的活动被确定为分析单元,并通过遵循扩展学习理论对活动中的矛盾进行定位和分类。根据我们的研究结果,我们提出了爱德华兹的关系实践的三个“园艺工具”,作为必要的变革所需的创新和适当的概念。通过利用这些工具,残疾儿童及其家庭被带到最前沿,专业人员与所有利益相关者合作,提高他们的专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信