Comparative Study of First-Order Moving Asymptotes Optimizers for the Moving Morphable Components Topology Optimization Framework

Thomas Rochefort-Beaudoin, A. Vadean, Jean-François Gamache, S. Achiche
{"title":"Comparative Study of First-Order Moving Asymptotes Optimizers for the Moving Morphable Components Topology Optimization Framework","authors":"Thomas Rochefort-Beaudoin, A. Vadean, Jean-François Gamache, S. Achiche","doi":"10.1115/detc2022-88722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Machine learning-accelerated topology optimization faces the challenge of generating large amounts of optimal topologies for supervised learning on a training dataset. This data generation step is challenging for the method of Moving Morphable Components (MMC) which presents an oscillatory behavior near local optimum that negatively affects its convergence speed and therefore present a high data generation cost. This paper presents a comparative study of the most-used first-order optimizers applied to minimum compliance problems under the MMC framework for topology optimization. The Method of Moving Asymptotes (MMA), its Globally Convergent version (GCMMA) and the hybrid MMA-GCMMA optimizer are compared using their final compliance and the total number of iterations until convergence as performance metrics. An extensive set of diversified boundary conditions for a rectangular beam minimum compliance problem is used as case study. The method of performance profiles is utilized to provide for each solver a probability distribution of outperforming its counterparts. Numerical results show that using a hybrid optimizer can accelerate the convergence speed of the MMC framework while still producing equally compliant topologies when compared to the MMA optimizer.","PeriodicalId":382970,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: 42nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE)","volume":"2012 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: 42nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-88722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Machine learning-accelerated topology optimization faces the challenge of generating large amounts of optimal topologies for supervised learning on a training dataset. This data generation step is challenging for the method of Moving Morphable Components (MMC) which presents an oscillatory behavior near local optimum that negatively affects its convergence speed and therefore present a high data generation cost. This paper presents a comparative study of the most-used first-order optimizers applied to minimum compliance problems under the MMC framework for topology optimization. The Method of Moving Asymptotes (MMA), its Globally Convergent version (GCMMA) and the hybrid MMA-GCMMA optimizer are compared using their final compliance and the total number of iterations until convergence as performance metrics. An extensive set of diversified boundary conditions for a rectangular beam minimum compliance problem is used as case study. The method of performance profiles is utilized to provide for each solver a probability distribution of outperforming its counterparts. Numerical results show that using a hybrid optimizer can accelerate the convergence speed of the MMC framework while still producing equally compliant topologies when compared to the MMA optimizer.
运动可变形元件拓扑优化框架一阶运动渐近线优化器的比较研究
该数据生成步骤对移动可变形分量(MMC)方法具有挑战性,该方法在局部最优附近呈现振荡行为,这对其收敛速度产生负面影响,因此存在较高的数据生成成本。在拓扑优化的MMC框架下,对最小柔度问题中最常用的一阶优化器进行了比较研究。将移动渐近线方法(MMA)及其全局收敛版本(GCMMA)和混合MMA-GCMMA优化器的最终遵从性和迭代总数作为性能指标进行比较。以矩形梁最小柔度问题为例,研究了一组广泛的多元边界条件。利用性能概况的方法为每个求解器提供优于其对应物的概率分布。数值结果表明,使用混合优化器可以加快MMC框架的收敛速度,同时与MMA优化器相比仍然可以产生相同的兼容拓扑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信