Lições da ‘Periferia’: Contrariando a Hegemonia Anglo­Geográfica sobre as Geografias de Sexualidade e Gênero

M. Pitoňák
{"title":"Lições da ‘Periferia’: Contrariando a Hegemonia Anglo­Geográfica sobre as Geografias de Sexualidade e Gênero","authors":"M. Pitoňák","doi":"10.5212/rlagg.v.10.i2.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article has three aims. First, I discuss the existing inequalities within the systems of knowledge production dominated by “Anglo­American” academia and critically examine the “East­West” binary to show that sexuality and gender/feminist scholars in geography should learn from their deconstructive skills to overcome hegemonies erected by these binaries both in academia and the related geopolitical landscapes. Second, I critically discuss the concept of “Central and Eastern Europe” (CEE) which I do not intend to stabilize, and hold up a mirror to the various hegemonic misunderstandings that take the form of “homogenization”, “dehistoricization”, “isolation” or by ascribing “backwardness”, by which they effectively erase or overlook knowledges and contributions of “non­AngloAmerican” scholars often left “beyond translation.” Last, I concentrate on the discussion of the development of geographies of sexualities and gender/feminist thought in CEE geography and illustrate the challenges that scholars from different institutional and national contexts must still face. By this article, I attempt to stand for our/their recognition.","PeriodicalId":107371,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latino-americana de Geografia e Genero","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latino-americana de Geografia e Genero","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5212/rlagg.v.10.i2.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article has three aims. First, I discuss the existing inequalities within the systems of knowledge production dominated by “Anglo­American” academia and critically examine the “East­West” binary to show that sexuality and gender/feminist scholars in geography should learn from their deconstructive skills to overcome hegemonies erected by these binaries both in academia and the related geopolitical landscapes. Second, I critically discuss the concept of “Central and Eastern Europe” (CEE) which I do not intend to stabilize, and hold up a mirror to the various hegemonic misunderstandings that take the form of “homogenization”, “dehistoricization”, “isolation” or by ascribing “backwardness”, by which they effectively erase or overlook knowledges and contributions of “non­AngloAmerican” scholars often left “beyond translation.” Last, I concentrate on the discussion of the development of geographies of sexualities and gender/feminist thought in CEE geography and illustrate the challenges that scholars from different institutional and national contexts must still face. By this article, I attempt to stand for our/their recognition.
来自“外围”的教训:在性和性别地理上对抗盎格鲁地理霸权
本文有三个目的。首先,我讨论了由“英美”学术界主导的知识生产体系中存在的不平等,并批判性地考察了“东西方”二元对立,以表明地理学中的性和性别/女权主义学者应该从他们的解构技巧中学习,以克服这些二元对立在学术界和相关地缘政治景观中建立的霸权。其次,我批判性地讨论了“中欧和东欧”(CEE)的概念,我不打算稳定这个概念,并为各种霸权主义误解提供了一面镜子,这些误解以“同质化”、“去历史化”、“孤立”或归因于“落后”的形式出现,它们有效地抹去或忽视了“非英美”学者的知识和贡献,这些知识和贡献往往“无法翻译”。最后,我集中讨论了中东欧地理学中性别地理学和性别/女权主义思想的发展,并说明了来自不同制度和国家背景的学者仍然必须面临的挑战。我写这篇文章是为了表示我们/他们的认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信