Recent Convergence Performance of CBOT Corn, Soybean, and Wheat Futures Contracts

S. Irwin, P. Garcia, D. Good, Eugene L. Kunda
{"title":"Recent Convergence Performance of CBOT Corn, Soybean, and Wheat Futures Contracts","authors":"S. Irwin, P. Garcia, D. Good, Eugene L. Kunda","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.94645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Futures markets play a key role in price discovery and risk transfer in many agricultural markets. Concerns have been raised about the performance of Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) grain futures contracts in a number of recent forums, most prominently at the Agricultural Forum hosted by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on April 22nd, 2008. Market participants have expressed concern that futures prices have been artificially inflated since the Fall of 2006, contributing to weak and erratic basis levels and a lack of convergence of cash and futures prices during delivery. In this article, we focus on the nature and consequences of recent convergence problems in CBOT (now CME Group, Inc.) corn, soybean and wheat futures contracts. We also briefly comment on proposals for changing the contracts to address the problems that have surfaced recently. Convergence problems at delivery locations are not necessarily identical to nondelivery basis performance issues, which are not addressed in this article. Basis in some nondelivery markets may be influenced by lack of convergence, but that is not uniformly the case. Corn basis at interior processing markets, for example, is less influenced by the Illinois River basis (delivery location) than cash markets close to the River. Basis at nondelivery locations is influenced by transportation costs, storage and ownership costs, supply of and demand for storage in the local market and merchandising risk (margin risk). All of these factors have likely contributed to weaker basis at many nondelivery markets.","PeriodicalId":185368,"journal":{"name":"Choices. The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resources Issues","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Choices. The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resources Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.94645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Futures markets play a key role in price discovery and risk transfer in many agricultural markets. Concerns have been raised about the performance of Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) grain futures contracts in a number of recent forums, most prominently at the Agricultural Forum hosted by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on April 22nd, 2008. Market participants have expressed concern that futures prices have been artificially inflated since the Fall of 2006, contributing to weak and erratic basis levels and a lack of convergence of cash and futures prices during delivery. In this article, we focus on the nature and consequences of recent convergence problems in CBOT (now CME Group, Inc.) corn, soybean and wheat futures contracts. We also briefly comment on proposals for changing the contracts to address the problems that have surfaced recently. Convergence problems at delivery locations are not necessarily identical to nondelivery basis performance issues, which are not addressed in this article. Basis in some nondelivery markets may be influenced by lack of convergence, but that is not uniformly the case. Corn basis at interior processing markets, for example, is less influenced by the Illinois River basis (delivery location) than cash markets close to the River. Basis at nondelivery locations is influenced by transportation costs, storage and ownership costs, supply of and demand for storage in the local market and merchandising risk (margin risk). All of these factors have likely contributed to weaker basis at many nondelivery markets.
芝加哥期货交易所玉米、大豆和小麦期货合约近期趋同表现
期货市场在许多农产品市场的价格发现和风险转移中发挥着关键作用。在最近的一些论坛上,人们对芝加哥期货交易所(CBOT)谷物期货合约的表现提出了担忧,最突出的是2008年4月22日由商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)主办的农业论坛。市场参与者表示担心,自2006年秋季以来,期货价格一直被人为抬高,导致基准水平疲弱且不稳定,而且在交割过程中,现货价格和期货价格缺乏趋同。在这篇文章中,我们将重点关注CBOT(现在的CME Group, Inc.)玉米、大豆和小麦期货合约近期收敛问题的性质和后果。我们还简要评论了修改合同以解决最近出现的问题的建议。交付地点的收敛问题不一定等同于未交付的基础性能问题,这在本文中没有讨论。一些非交割市场的基准可能受到缺乏趋同的影响,但情况并非总是如此。例如,与靠近伊利诺伊河的现货市场相比,国内加工市场的玉米基价受伊利诺伊河基价(交货地点)的影响较小。非交货地点的基础受运输成本、存储和所有权成本、当地市场存储的供应和需求以及销售风险(利润风险)的影响。所有这些因素都可能导致许多非交割市场的基础走弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信