Update on Myanmar’s Ethnic Peace Process

N. Ganesan
{"title":"Update on Myanmar’s Ethnic Peace Process","authors":"N. Ganesan","doi":"10.35369/JPUS.11.1.201906.349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There were a number of new developments in Myanmar’s ethnic peace process since the last Panglong Peace Conference in July 2018. The first of these was a unilateral ceasefire declaration by the military for its north, northeast and southern commands for a period of 4 months from January to April 2019. According to the military this announcement was meant to facilitate the peace process in order to try and end armed conflict in the country by 2020 and in time for the next election. However, this announcement had little impact on Rakhine state in the west where attempts by the Arakan Army (AA) to establish a foothold in the state has led to a serious surge in fighting as well as new groups of internally displaced persons. This new front has now become the most volatile region in the country and adds on to a list of grievances between Rakhine nationalists in the state on the one hand and the central government and the military on the other. Another major development has been attempts by the National League for Democracy (NLD)-led parliament to amend the constitution, much to the chagrin of the military that has stoutly opposed it thus far.\nThis article examines the most important developments that have occurred in Myanmar’s ethnic peace process since the Third 21st Century Panglong Peace Conference that was held in August 2018. Specifically it examines the military’s unilateral ceasefire that was declared in January 2019, and the upsurge of violence in Rakhine state since then. Then it goes on to look at the Karen National Union’s withdrawal from formal meetings of the peace process since last October and the chances of the Karenni National Progressive Party (KNPP) possibly signing on to the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) in the footsteps of the New Mon State Party (NMSP) and the Lahu Democratic Union (LDU). The fourth section outlines the continued fighting in the Shan states between the Ta’ang National Liberation Army (TNLA) on the one hand and the Restoration Council of the Shan States (RCSS) and the Shan State Progress Party (SSPP) on the other that has continued unabated with a seeming dynamic of its own. The fifth section looks at continued Chinese attempts to broker peace between the Northern Alliance and the government while the final section examines the dynamics associated with the NLD-led parliament’s attempts to amend the 2008 Constitution that has put it on a seeming collision course with the military. The concluding section then describes the likely future issues and trajectories in the peace process.","PeriodicalId":285725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Peace and Unification Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Peace and Unification Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35369/JPUS.11.1.201906.349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There were a number of new developments in Myanmar’s ethnic peace process since the last Panglong Peace Conference in July 2018. The first of these was a unilateral ceasefire declaration by the military for its north, northeast and southern commands for a period of 4 months from January to April 2019. According to the military this announcement was meant to facilitate the peace process in order to try and end armed conflict in the country by 2020 and in time for the next election. However, this announcement had little impact on Rakhine state in the west where attempts by the Arakan Army (AA) to establish a foothold in the state has led to a serious surge in fighting as well as new groups of internally displaced persons. This new front has now become the most volatile region in the country and adds on to a list of grievances between Rakhine nationalists in the state on the one hand and the central government and the military on the other. Another major development has been attempts by the National League for Democracy (NLD)-led parliament to amend the constitution, much to the chagrin of the military that has stoutly opposed it thus far. This article examines the most important developments that have occurred in Myanmar’s ethnic peace process since the Third 21st Century Panglong Peace Conference that was held in August 2018. Specifically it examines the military’s unilateral ceasefire that was declared in January 2019, and the upsurge of violence in Rakhine state since then. Then it goes on to look at the Karen National Union’s withdrawal from formal meetings of the peace process since last October and the chances of the Karenni National Progressive Party (KNPP) possibly signing on to the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) in the footsteps of the New Mon State Party (NMSP) and the Lahu Democratic Union (LDU). The fourth section outlines the continued fighting in the Shan states between the Ta’ang National Liberation Army (TNLA) on the one hand and the Restoration Council of the Shan States (RCSS) and the Shan State Progress Party (SSPP) on the other that has continued unabated with a seeming dynamic of its own. The fifth section looks at continued Chinese attempts to broker peace between the Northern Alliance and the government while the final section examines the dynamics associated with the NLD-led parliament’s attempts to amend the 2008 Constitution that has put it on a seeming collision course with the military. The concluding section then describes the likely future issues and trajectories in the peace process.
缅甸民族和平进程最新进展
自2018年7月上届彬龙和平会议以来,缅甸民族和平进程取得了一些新进展。第一个是军方单方面宣布停火,从2019年1月至4月,为期4个月。根据军方的说法,这一声明是为了促进和平进程,以便在2020年之前结束该国的武装冲突,并及时举行下一次选举。然而,这一声明对西部的若开邦影响不大,若开军(AA)试图在该邦建立立足点的企图导致了战斗的严重激增,以及新的国内流离失所者群体。这条新战线现在已成为该国最动荡的地区,并为该邦的若开民族主义者与中央政府和军方之间的不满增添了一笔。另一个重大进展是全国民主联盟(NLD)领导的议会试图修改宪法,这让迄今为止坚决反对修改宪法的军方非常懊恼。本文考察了自2018年8月举行的第三届21世纪彬龙和平会议以来缅甸民族和平进程中发生的最重要事态发展。报告特别审查了军方于2019年1月宣布的单方面停火,以及自那以来若开邦暴力事件的激增。然后,文章继续关注克伦民族联盟自去年10月以来退出和平进程的正式会议,以及克伦民族进步党(KNPP)可能追随新孟邦党(NMSP)和拉祜族民主联盟(LDU)的脚步签署全国停火协议(NCA)的可能性。第四部分概述了在掸邦持续不断的战斗,一方是塔扬民族解放军(TNLA),另一方是掸邦恢复委员会(RCSS)和掸邦进步党(SSPP),战斗势头有增无减。第五部分着眼于中国在北方联盟与政府之间斡旋和平的持续努力,而最后一部分研究了与全国民主联盟领导的议会试图修改2008年宪法有关的动态,该宪法似乎使其与军方发生冲突。最后一节描述了和平进程中未来可能出现的问题和轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信