A retrospective study of transfusion practice: Blood crossmatch ordering in obstetrics

S. Malik, J. Anwari, Musaed Alshahrani, Rashed Alotaibi
{"title":"A retrospective study of transfusion practice: Blood crossmatch ordering in obstetrics","authors":"S. Malik, J. Anwari, Musaed Alshahrani, Rashed Alotaibi","doi":"10.4103/SJL.SJL_10_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Parturient undergoing elective cesarian delivery (CD) in a busy tertiary care referral hospital often requires blood transfusions. The preoperative ordering for blood crossmatch frequently overshoots the actual need of transfusion. Aims: The primary aim of this study was to audit the local blood ordering practice in obstetric anesthesia and compare with the international guidelines. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent elective CD over a period of 6 months was done. The data collected included patients' age, pretransfusion hemoglobin, timing of transfusion, number of units crossmatched, and number of units transfused. The crossmatch transfusion ratio (CTR), transfusion probability, and transfusion index were calculated from the data. Results: A total of 425 patients underwent CD with mean age 33 (standard deviation 7). Seventy-seven (18%) of them were crossmatched with total 252 units. Thirty-one (7.3%) patients required transfusion and the number of units transfused was 79. CTR in our study was 3.2. Conclusion: CTR for elective CD is higher than the recommended international quality indicator value. There is a need to develop institutional specific blood ordering schedule to bring improvement in transfusion practices.","PeriodicalId":388688,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Laparoscopy","volume":"179 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Laparoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/SJL.SJL_10_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Parturient undergoing elective cesarian delivery (CD) in a busy tertiary care referral hospital often requires blood transfusions. The preoperative ordering for blood crossmatch frequently overshoots the actual need of transfusion. Aims: The primary aim of this study was to audit the local blood ordering practice in obstetric anesthesia and compare with the international guidelines. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent elective CD over a period of 6 months was done. The data collected included patients' age, pretransfusion hemoglobin, timing of transfusion, number of units crossmatched, and number of units transfused. The crossmatch transfusion ratio (CTR), transfusion probability, and transfusion index were calculated from the data. Results: A total of 425 patients underwent CD with mean age 33 (standard deviation 7). Seventy-seven (18%) of them were crossmatched with total 252 units. Thirty-one (7.3%) patients required transfusion and the number of units transfused was 79. CTR in our study was 3.2. Conclusion: CTR for elective CD is higher than the recommended international quality indicator value. There is a need to develop institutional specific blood ordering schedule to bring improvement in transfusion practices.
输血实践的回顾性研究:产科血液交叉配型排序
背景:在繁忙的三级转诊医院接受选择性剖宫产(CD)的产妇经常需要输血。术前交叉配血的指令经常超过输血的实际需要。目的:本研究的主要目的是审核产科麻醉中当地的采血实践,并与国际指南进行比较。材料和方法:对6个月的选择性CD患者进行回顾性分析。收集的数据包括患者的年龄、输血前血红蛋白、输血时间、交叉匹配单位数和输血单位数。根据数据计算交叉配血比(CTR)、输血概率、输血指数。结果:共有425例患者接受了CD治疗,平均年龄为33岁(标准差为7)。其中77例(18%)患者进行了共252个单位的交叉匹配。31例(7.3%)患者需要输血,输血单位为79个。本研究CTR为3.2。结论:选择性CD的CTR高于国际推荐的质量指标值。有必要制定机构特定的血液订购时间表,以改善输血做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信