A predictive coding model of representational drawing in human children and chimpanzees

A. Philippsen, Y. Nagai
{"title":"A predictive coding model of representational drawing in human children and chimpanzees","authors":"A. Philippsen, Y. Nagai","doi":"10.1109/DEVLRN.2019.8850701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Humans and chimpanzees differ in the way that they draw. Human children from a certain age tend to create representational drawings, that is, drawings which represent objects. Chimpanzees, although equipped with sufficient motor skills, do not improve beyond the stage of scribbling behavior. To investigate the underlying cognitive mechanisms, we propose a computational model of predictive coding which allows us to change the way that sensory information and prior predictions are updated into posterior beliefs during time series prediction. We replicate the results of a study from experimental psychology which examined the ability of children and chimpanzees to complete partial drawings of a face. Our results reveal that typical or stronger reliance on the prior enables the network to perform representational drawings as observed in children. In contrast, too weak reliance on the prior replicates the findings that were observed in chimpanzees: existing lines are traced with high accuracy, but non-existing parts are not added to complete a representational drawing. The ability to perform representational drawings, thus, could be explained by subtle changes in how strongly prior information is integrated with sensory percepts rather than by the presence or absence of a specific cognitive mechanism.","PeriodicalId":318973,"journal":{"name":"2019 Joint IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Joint IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2019.8850701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Humans and chimpanzees differ in the way that they draw. Human children from a certain age tend to create representational drawings, that is, drawings which represent objects. Chimpanzees, although equipped with sufficient motor skills, do not improve beyond the stage of scribbling behavior. To investigate the underlying cognitive mechanisms, we propose a computational model of predictive coding which allows us to change the way that sensory information and prior predictions are updated into posterior beliefs during time series prediction. We replicate the results of a study from experimental psychology which examined the ability of children and chimpanzees to complete partial drawings of a face. Our results reveal that typical or stronger reliance on the prior enables the network to perform representational drawings as observed in children. In contrast, too weak reliance on the prior replicates the findings that were observed in chimpanzees: existing lines are traced with high accuracy, but non-existing parts are not added to complete a representational drawing. The ability to perform representational drawings, thus, could be explained by subtle changes in how strongly prior information is integrated with sensory percepts rather than by the presence or absence of a specific cognitive mechanism.
儿童和黑猩猩具象绘画的预测编码模型
人类和黑猩猩的绘画方式不同。人类儿童从一定年龄开始就倾向于创作具象绘画,即描绘物体的绘画。黑猩猩虽然具备了足够的运动技能,但在涂鸦行为的阶段之外并没有进步。为了研究潜在的认知机制,我们提出了一个预测编码的计算模型,该模型允许我们在时间序列预测中改变感官信息和先验预测更新为后验信念的方式。我们复制了一项实验心理学研究的结果,该研究考察了儿童和黑猩猩完成面部部分绘图的能力。我们的研究结果表明,对先验的典型或更强的依赖使网络能够执行在儿童中观察到的代表性绘画。相比之下,过于微弱地依赖于先前的复制在黑猩猩身上观察到的发现:现有的线条被精确地描绘出来,但不存在的部分不会被添加到完整的代表性绘画中。因此,表现绘画的能力可以用先验信息与感官知觉整合程度的微妙变化来解释,而不是用特定认知机制的存在或缺失来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信