Refractive outcomes of laser-treated and non-laser-treated retinopathy of prematurity at Hospital Selayang: a 2-year retrospective review

A. Sharifuddin, F. L. M. Chew, I. Effendi-Tenang, A. Samsudin
{"title":"Refractive outcomes of laser-treated and non-laser-treated retinopathy of prematurity at Hospital Selayang: a 2-year retrospective review","authors":"A. Sharifuddin, F. L. M. Chew, I. Effendi-Tenang, A. Samsudin","doi":"10.35119/myjo.v3i4.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the refractive outcomes of laser-treated and non-laser-treated retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) infant, at 2 years of age in Hospital Selayang.Methods: Retrospective review involving patients born between 2016 and 2018. They were divided into those who were treated with laser photocoagulation, and those who were observed. Laser treatment was given to infants with threshold and high-risk, pre-threshold disease. Refractive error was identified by cycloplegic refraction at 2 years of age.Results: There were 22 eyes from 11 infants in the laser-treated group, all of which had zone II ROP with plus disease; of these, four had stage 2 ROP and 18 had stage 3 ROP. There were 53 eyes from 28 patients in the non-laser-treated group. The mean birth weight for the laser-treated and non-laser-treated groups was 966.9 ± 92.6 g and 1019.3 ± 282.0 g, respectively (P = 0.398). Mean gestational age for the laser-treated and non-laser-treated groups was 28.2 ± 2.2 weeks and 27.7 ± 2.2 weeks, respectively (P = 0.390). At 2 years, the mean spherical equivalence for the laser-treated and non-laser treated groups was -0.55 ± 2.49 D and +0.17 ± 1.43 D, respectively, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.120). Myopia was commoner in the laser-treated group (six eyes [27%] vs five eyes [9%], P = 0.047), and two eyes from two different infants (10%) from this group also developed high myopia (> -6.00 D). For hypermetropia and astigmatism, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups (all P > 0.05). High myopia was strongly related to the post-conceptual age when receiving laser therapy (P = 0.025). In the laser-treated group, two infants (9%) had amblyopia and one (5%) had exotropia at 2 years of age. None of the eyes developed structural retinal sequelae.Conclusion: Despite successful treatment of ROP, a significant number of laser-treated eyes developed myopia. This highlights the need for long-term refractive screening in these patients.","PeriodicalId":405983,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35119/myjo.v3i4.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the refractive outcomes of laser-treated and non-laser-treated retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) infant, at 2 years of age in Hospital Selayang.Methods: Retrospective review involving patients born between 2016 and 2018. They were divided into those who were treated with laser photocoagulation, and those who were observed. Laser treatment was given to infants with threshold and high-risk, pre-threshold disease. Refractive error was identified by cycloplegic refraction at 2 years of age.Results: There were 22 eyes from 11 infants in the laser-treated group, all of which had zone II ROP with plus disease; of these, four had stage 2 ROP and 18 had stage 3 ROP. There were 53 eyes from 28 patients in the non-laser-treated group. The mean birth weight for the laser-treated and non-laser-treated groups was 966.9 ± 92.6 g and 1019.3 ± 282.0 g, respectively (P = 0.398). Mean gestational age for the laser-treated and non-laser-treated groups was 28.2 ± 2.2 weeks and 27.7 ± 2.2 weeks, respectively (P = 0.390). At 2 years, the mean spherical equivalence for the laser-treated and non-laser treated groups was -0.55 ± 2.49 D and +0.17 ± 1.43 D, respectively, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.120). Myopia was commoner in the laser-treated group (six eyes [27%] vs five eyes [9%], P = 0.047), and two eyes from two different infants (10%) from this group also developed high myopia (> -6.00 D). For hypermetropia and astigmatism, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups (all P > 0.05). High myopia was strongly related to the post-conceptual age when receiving laser therapy (P = 0.025). In the laser-treated group, two infants (9%) had amblyopia and one (5%) had exotropia at 2 years of age. None of the eyes developed structural retinal sequelae.Conclusion: Despite successful treatment of ROP, a significant number of laser-treated eyes developed myopia. This highlights the need for long-term refractive screening in these patients.
Selayang医院激光治疗和非激光治疗早产儿视网膜病变的屈光效果:2年回顾性回顾
目的:比较色阳医院2岁早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)激光治疗与非激光治疗的屈光效果。方法:回顾性分析2016 - 2018年出生的患者。将其分为激光光凝治疗组和观察组。对阈值、高危、阈前疾病的婴儿进行激光治疗。屈光不正在2岁时通过睫状体麻痹性屈光确认。结果:激光治疗组11例患儿22只眼,均为II区ROP伴病变;其中4例为2期ROP, 18例为3期ROP。非激光治疗组28例患者53只眼。激光治疗组和非激光治疗组的平均出生体重分别为966.9±92.6 g和1019.3±282.0 g (P = 0.398)。激光治疗组和非激光治疗组的平均胎龄分别为28.2±2.2周和27.7±2.2周(P = 0.390)。2年时,激光治疗组和非激光治疗组的平均球面等效度分别为-0.55±2.49 D和+0.17±1.43 D,尽管差异无统计学意义(P = 0.120)。近视在激光治疗组较为常见(6只眼[27%]vs 5只眼[9%],P = 0.047),该组两名不同婴儿的2只眼(10%)也出现高度近视(> -6.00 D),远视和散光两组间差异无统计学意义(P均为> 0.05)。高度近视与接受激光治疗时的产后年龄密切相关(P = 0.025)。在激光治疗组中,两名婴儿(9%)在两岁时患有弱视,一名(5%)患有外斜视。没有一只眼睛出现结构性视网膜后遗症。结论:尽管ROP治疗成功,但仍有相当数量的激光治疗眼发生近视。这突出了对这些患者进行长期屈光筛查的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信