Deflection Measurement Considerations in Evaluating FRC Performance Using ASTM C 1018

C. Johnston
{"title":"Deflection Measurement Considerations in Evaluating FRC Performance Using ASTM C 1018","authors":"C. Johnston","doi":"10.14359/926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of how the method of determining midspan deflection in American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) C1018 toughness tests influences first-crack strength, first-crack deflection, toughness indices, and residual strength factors is addressed by comparing results obtained using the method now required in the current standard. The standard is based on net midspan deflection determined as the nominal midspan deflection minus the average of the deflections measured at the beam supports, with corresponding same-specimen results based on nominal midspan deflection only which was not explicitly excluded in earlier versions of the standard. The problem of dealing with the portion of load-deflection relationship immediately after first crack when it is unstable is also discussed. The range of test specimens for which comparative data are reported includes a series of third-point-loaded beams with three different steel fibers of varying lengths, a second smaller series of beams that allows for assessment of the effects of beam size and fiber alignment, and a series of beams with a single type of fibrillated polypropylene fiber. Fiber contents are varied as well. The results demonstrate the extent to which the C1018 parameters are effective in distinguishing the performance of the various fiber reinforced concrete mixtures in terms of fiber type, geometry, and amount.","PeriodicalId":189804,"journal":{"name":"SP-155: Testing of Fiber Reinforced Concrete","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SP-155: Testing of Fiber Reinforced Concrete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14359/926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The issue of how the method of determining midspan deflection in American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) C1018 toughness tests influences first-crack strength, first-crack deflection, toughness indices, and residual strength factors is addressed by comparing results obtained using the method now required in the current standard. The standard is based on net midspan deflection determined as the nominal midspan deflection minus the average of the deflections measured at the beam supports, with corresponding same-specimen results based on nominal midspan deflection only which was not explicitly excluded in earlier versions of the standard. The problem of dealing with the portion of load-deflection relationship immediately after first crack when it is unstable is also discussed. The range of test specimens for which comparative data are reported includes a series of third-point-loaded beams with three different steel fibers of varying lengths, a second smaller series of beams that allows for assessment of the effects of beam size and fiber alignment, and a series of beams with a single type of fibrillated polypropylene fiber. Fiber contents are varied as well. The results demonstrate the extent to which the C1018 parameters are effective in distinguishing the performance of the various fiber reinforced concrete mixtures in terms of fiber type, geometry, and amount.
使用ASTM C 1018评估FRC性能的挠度测量考虑
美国材料试验协会(ASTM) C1018韧性试验中确定跨中挠度的方法如何影响初裂强度、初裂挠度、韧性指标和残余强度因子,通过比较使用当前标准中要求的方法获得的结果来解决这个问题。该标准基于净跨中挠度,即标称跨中挠度减去在梁支撑处测量的挠度的平均值,相应的同一试件结果仅基于标称跨中挠度,这在早期版本的标准中没有明确排除。讨论了在不稳定情况下,第一次开裂后的荷载-挠度关系部分的处理问题。所报告的比较数据的测试样本范围包括一系列具有三种不同长度的不同钢纤维的第三点荷载梁,第二个较小的梁系列,允许评估梁尺寸和纤维排列的影响,以及一系列具有单一类型的纤维化聚丙烯纤维的梁。纤维含量也多种多样。结果表明,C1018参数在纤维类型、几何形状和数量方面区分各种纤维增强混凝土混合料性能的有效程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信