Can the Earth be Sacred Once Again? Christianity and Climate Change

S. Mcgrath
{"title":"Can the Earth be Sacred Once Again? Christianity and Climate Change","authors":"S. Mcgrath","doi":"10.26443/jcreor.v2i1.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following paper takes Pope Francis’ Encyclical on Climate Change as an opportunity to re-open the debate, begun in 1967 by Lynn White Jr., on the theological origins of the environmental crisis. I note that the Pope’s critique of consumerist modernity is strong, but his lack of a genealogical account of modernity remains a weakness of the text. I argue, with White, that the technological revolution which has caused climate change would not have been possible without Christian assumptions. The original disenchantment of the world was the Abrahamic revelation which disjoined divinity and nature, and contra to appearances, the disjunction was only exacerbated by the doctrine of the incarnation. With climate change, modernity is returning to this revelation in the form of the sobering experience of the precarity of the planet. Nature is now experienced as finite once again, and it includes us. Modernity, however, cannot be disavowed any more than disenchantment can easily be forgotten. A return to the Christian roots of disenchantment might help us to remember what we have forgotten: the virtue of contemplation, which could qualify modern attitudes of control and domination, and engender a Christian experience of reverence for nature. While this is a Christian response to the climate crisis, other religious traditions will need to come to analogous forms of earth-centered ethics if we are to achieved the integrated ecological pluralism needed for the future of civilization.","PeriodicalId":178128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Council for Research on Religion","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Council for Research on Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26443/jcreor.v2i1.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following paper takes Pope Francis’ Encyclical on Climate Change as an opportunity to re-open the debate, begun in 1967 by Lynn White Jr., on the theological origins of the environmental crisis. I note that the Pope’s critique of consumerist modernity is strong, but his lack of a genealogical account of modernity remains a weakness of the text. I argue, with White, that the technological revolution which has caused climate change would not have been possible without Christian assumptions. The original disenchantment of the world was the Abrahamic revelation which disjoined divinity and nature, and contra to appearances, the disjunction was only exacerbated by the doctrine of the incarnation. With climate change, modernity is returning to this revelation in the form of the sobering experience of the precarity of the planet. Nature is now experienced as finite once again, and it includes us. Modernity, however, cannot be disavowed any more than disenchantment can easily be forgotten. A return to the Christian roots of disenchantment might help us to remember what we have forgotten: the virtue of contemplation, which could qualify modern attitudes of control and domination, and engender a Christian experience of reverence for nature. While this is a Christian response to the climate crisis, other religious traditions will need to come to analogous forms of earth-centered ethics if we are to achieved the integrated ecological pluralism needed for the future of civilization.
地球能再次神圣吗?基督教与气候变化
下面这篇文章以教皇方济各的《气候变化通谕》为契机,重新开启了由林恩·怀特(Lynn White Jr.)于1967年发起的关于环境危机神学根源的辩论。我注意到教皇对消费主义现代性的批判是强烈的,但他缺乏对现代性的系谱描述仍然是文本的一个弱点。我和怀特一样认为,如果没有基督教的假设,导致气候变化的技术革命是不可能发生的。世界的最初觉醒是亚伯拉罕的启示,它把神性和自然分离开来,与现象相反,这种分离只会因化身的教义而加剧。随着气候变化,现代性正以对地球不稳定性的清醒体验的形式回归这种启示。大自然现在再次被体验为有限的,它包括我们。然而,我们不能否认现代性,正如我们不能轻易忘记祛魅一样。回归基督教的祛魅之根或许能帮助我们回忆起我们已经遗忘的东西:沉思的美德,它可以使现代的控制和支配态度符合条件,并产生一种基督教对自然的敬畏。虽然这是基督教对气候危机的回应,但如果我们要实现未来文明所需的综合生态多元化,其他宗教传统将需要类似形式的以地球为中心的伦理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信