Cellulase Activity in Gastropods: Should It Be Used in Niche Separation?

D. Kesler
{"title":"Cellulase Activity in Gastropods: Should It Be Used in Niche Separation?","authors":"D. Kesler","doi":"10.2307/1467148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hypothesis tested was that snail species with different diet preferences should exhibit different CMCase (carboxymethylcellulase) activities. CMCase activities of three species in a tempory pond, and two species in a permanent lake, in Indiana were determined. While the three temporary pond species have significantly different diet preferences (Brown 1982), a one-way ANOVA of CMCase activities yielded no significant difference (P>0.05), suggesting that cellulolytic enzymes were not being used in niche separation when the snails were collected. Reducing sugars were formed when homogenates of Aplexa, Lymnaea, Physa, and Goniobasis were incubated with microcrystalline cellulose, demonstrating that these species can degrade native cellulose for possible nutritive value. CMCase activities of different parts of the digestive system of Pseudosuccinea columella were determined in snails from two locations in Rhode Island. A two-way ANOVA indicated a possible pond effect (P=0.079), strengthening the conclusion of no CMCase activity differences among the Indiana woodland species. Activity in the stomach was significantly (P<0.05) greater than that observed in the digestive gland in both freshly collected and starved individuals. Starvation did not significantly reduce CMCase activity.","PeriodicalId":154110,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Invertebrate Biology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Freshwater Invertebrate Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1467148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The hypothesis tested was that snail species with different diet preferences should exhibit different CMCase (carboxymethylcellulase) activities. CMCase activities of three species in a tempory pond, and two species in a permanent lake, in Indiana were determined. While the three temporary pond species have significantly different diet preferences (Brown 1982), a one-way ANOVA of CMCase activities yielded no significant difference (P>0.05), suggesting that cellulolytic enzymes were not being used in niche separation when the snails were collected. Reducing sugars were formed when homogenates of Aplexa, Lymnaea, Physa, and Goniobasis were incubated with microcrystalline cellulose, demonstrating that these species can degrade native cellulose for possible nutritive value. CMCase activities of different parts of the digestive system of Pseudosuccinea columella were determined in snails from two locations in Rhode Island. A two-way ANOVA indicated a possible pond effect (P=0.079), strengthening the conclusion of no CMCase activity differences among the Indiana woodland species. Activity in the stomach was significantly (P<0.05) greater than that observed in the digestive gland in both freshly collected and starved individuals. Starvation did not significantly reduce CMCase activity.
腹足类纤维素酶活性:是否应用于生态位分离?
结果表明,不同饮食偏好的蜗牛表现出不同的羧甲基纤维素酶活性。测定了印第安那州一个临时池塘中的3个物种和一个永久湖泊中的2个物种的CMCase活动。虽然3种临时池塘种对食物的偏好有显著差异(Brown 1982),但CMCase活性的单因素方差分析结果无显著差异(P>0.05),这表明在收集蜗牛时没有使用纤维素水解酶进行生态位分离。当Aplexa, lynaea, Physa和Goniobasis的匀浆与微晶纤维素孵育时形成还原糖,表明这些物种可以降解天然纤维素以获得可能的营养价值。对美国罗得岛州两个地点蜗牛消化系统不同部位的CMCase活性进行了测定。双向方差分析显示可能存在池塘效应(P=0.079),进一步证实了印第安纳林地树种间CMCase活性无差异的结论。胃的活性显著(P<0.05)高于新鲜采集和饥饿个体的消化腺。饥饿没有显著降低CMCase活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信