Model Uncertainty and Systematic Risk in US Banking

Lieven Baele, V. D. Bruyckere, Olivier De Jonghe, Rudi Vander Vennet
{"title":"Model Uncertainty and Systematic Risk in US Banking","authors":"Lieven Baele, V. D. Bruyckere, Olivier De Jonghe, Rudi Vander Vennet","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2216563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses Bayesian Model Averaging to examine the driving factors of equity returns of US Bank Holding Companies. BMA has as an advantage over OLS that it accounts for the considerable uncertainty about the correct set (model) of bank risk factors. We find that out of a broad set of 12risk factors only the market, real estate, and high-minus-low Fama–French factors are reliably related to US bank stock returns over the period 1986–2010. Other factors are either only relevant over specific subperiods or for subsets of bank holding companies. We discuss the implications of our findings for empirical banking research.","PeriodicalId":170864,"journal":{"name":"PSN: International Finance & Investment (Topic)","volume":"308 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: International Finance & Investment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2216563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

This paper uses Bayesian Model Averaging to examine the driving factors of equity returns of US Bank Holding Companies. BMA has as an advantage over OLS that it accounts for the considerable uncertainty about the correct set (model) of bank risk factors. We find that out of a broad set of 12risk factors only the market, real estate, and high-minus-low Fama–French factors are reliably related to US bank stock returns over the period 1986–2010. Other factors are either only relevant over specific subperiods or for subsets of bank holding companies. We discuss the implications of our findings for empirical banking research.
美国银行业的模型不确定性与系统风险
本文采用贝叶斯平均模型对美国银行控股公司股权收益的驱动因素进行了研究。BMA相对于OLS的优势在于,它可以解释银行风险因素正确集合(模型)的相当大的不确定性。我们发现,在广泛的12个风险因素中,只有市场、房地产和高负低法玛-法朗因素与1986-2010年期间的美国银行股回报可靠相关。其他因素要么只与特定子期相关,要么与银行控股公司的子期相关。我们讨论了我们的发现对实证银行研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信