Comparison of Different Foam Rolling Protocols on Ankle Range of Motion, Strength, Muscle Activation and Jump Performance

E. Soares, Vinícius Martins Almeida, Christine Megumi Wakuda de Abreu Vasconcelos, João Henrique Barbosa de Jesus, Charles Ricardo Lopes
{"title":"Comparison of Different Foam Rolling Protocols on Ankle Range of Motion, Strength, Muscle Activation and Jump Performance","authors":"E. Soares, Vinícius Martins Almeida, Christine Megumi Wakuda de Abreu Vasconcelos, João Henrique Barbosa de Jesus, Charles Ricardo Lopes","doi":"10.47206/ijsc.v2i1.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Foam rolling (FR) has been widely used with the intent to increase range of motion (ROM) before strength and power activities. At the moment, few studies have investigated practical strategies to control FR intensity. Purpose: The aim was to compare the effect (FR) intensity by different combinations of a smooth roller, grid roller, unilateral or bilateral rolling massage on the triceps suralis ROM, strength, muscle activation, and jump performance. Methods: Ten male (28±4 years, 175±5 cm, 81±13 kg) and ten female (29±4 years, 163±5 cm, 66±10 kg) recreationally trained performed two sessions of data collection that compared 4 combinations of rolling surface and technique: unilateral smooth roller (US), bilateral smooth roller (BS), unilateral grid roller (UG), and bilateral grid roller (BG). During all conditions, the triceps suralis was rolled for 2 sets of 60 s with 60 s of rest between sets. Rate of perceived pain (RPP) after the rolling protocol; peak force during a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) (PF), muscle activation during a MVIC, and unilateral drop jump (UDJ) performance were measured before and after each condition. Results: The greatest RPP was reported in UG condition and the lowest RPP was reported in BS condition. All conditions increased ankle ROM to the same extent without subsequent effect on PF, muscle activity UDJ height, and UDJ contact time. Our data indicate that FR using different combinations of surface pattern and rolling techniques increased ankle ROM without a subsequent effect on drop jump performance, triceps suralis strength, and activation. Conclusion: In conclusion, practitioners could be encouraged to perform FR with mild discomfort and use a bilateral technique to save time. \nKeywords: Flexibility, self-myofascial release, electromyography, force, strength.","PeriodicalId":170948,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v2i1.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Foam rolling (FR) has been widely used with the intent to increase range of motion (ROM) before strength and power activities. At the moment, few studies have investigated practical strategies to control FR intensity. Purpose: The aim was to compare the effect (FR) intensity by different combinations of a smooth roller, grid roller, unilateral or bilateral rolling massage on the triceps suralis ROM, strength, muscle activation, and jump performance. Methods: Ten male (28±4 years, 175±5 cm, 81±13 kg) and ten female (29±4 years, 163±5 cm, 66±10 kg) recreationally trained performed two sessions of data collection that compared 4 combinations of rolling surface and technique: unilateral smooth roller (US), bilateral smooth roller (BS), unilateral grid roller (UG), and bilateral grid roller (BG). During all conditions, the triceps suralis was rolled for 2 sets of 60 s with 60 s of rest between sets. Rate of perceived pain (RPP) after the rolling protocol; peak force during a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) (PF), muscle activation during a MVIC, and unilateral drop jump (UDJ) performance were measured before and after each condition. Results: The greatest RPP was reported in UG condition and the lowest RPP was reported in BS condition. All conditions increased ankle ROM to the same extent without subsequent effect on PF, muscle activity UDJ height, and UDJ contact time. Our data indicate that FR using different combinations of surface pattern and rolling techniques increased ankle ROM without a subsequent effect on drop jump performance, triceps suralis strength, and activation. Conclusion: In conclusion, practitioners could be encouraged to perform FR with mild discomfort and use a bilateral technique to save time. Keywords: Flexibility, self-myofascial release, electromyography, force, strength.
不同泡沫滚动方案对踝关节活动范围、力量、肌肉激活和跳跃性能的比较
背景:泡沫滚动(FR)已被广泛用于增加力量和力量活动前的活动范围(ROM)。目前,很少有研究探讨控制FR强度的实用策略。目的:比较平滑滚轮、网格滚轮、单侧或双侧滚轮按摩对腓骨三头肌ROM的不同组合的效果(FR)强度、力量、肌肉激活和跳跃表现。方法:10名男性(28±4岁,175±5 cm, 81±13 kg)和10名女性(29±4岁,163±5 cm, 66±10 kg)进行娱乐训练,进行两组数据收集,比较4种滚动表面和技术组合:单侧光滑辊(US)、双侧光滑辊(BS)、单侧网格辊(UG)和双侧网格辊(BG)。在所有条件下,腹三头肌滚动2组,每组60秒,每组之间休息60秒。滚动方案后感知疼痛率(RPP);在每个条件之前和之后测量最大自主等长收缩(MVIC) (PF)期间的峰值力,MVIC期间的肌肉激活和单侧落差跳(UDJ)表现。结果:UG组RPP最大,BS组RPP最小。所有条件均使踝关节ROM增加到相同程度,但对PF、肌肉活动、UDJ高度和UDJ接触时间没有影响。我们的数据表明,使用不同表面图案和滚动技术组合的FR增加了踝关节ROM,而不会对弹跳性能、腓骨三头肌力量和激活产生后续影响。结论:总之,可以鼓励医生在轻度不适的情况下进行FR,并使用双侧技术来节省时间。关键词:柔韧性,自我肌筋膜释放,肌电图,力,强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信