{"title":"Hieroglyphic Palaeography","authors":"Frédéric Servajean","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190604653.013.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hieroglyphic palaeography has never been systematically studied until very recently. The earlier works considered the hieroglyphic sign from the perspective of the history of art. In the 1970s, new perspectives emerged thanks to H. G. Fischer, who developed an original approach through which the sign is coupled with cultural facts. However, it was not until 2004 that the first hieroglyphic palaeography program was launched by D. Meeks. There is, however, an area that escapes hieroglyphic palaeography: that of the cursive hieroglyphics. This is the reason why U. Verhoeven has just launched an inventory program of hieratic and hieroglyphic cursive signs.Only the analysis of the different stages of execution of a monumental inscription—from the cursive sign to the carved and painted sign—will make it possible to understand the work of scribes. Hieroglyphic palaeography will then be able to make up for lost time.","PeriodicalId":416825,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Egyptian Epigraphy and Paleography","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Egyptian Epigraphy and Paleography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190604653.013.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hieroglyphic palaeography has never been systematically studied until very recently. The earlier works considered the hieroglyphic sign from the perspective of the history of art. In the 1970s, new perspectives emerged thanks to H. G. Fischer, who developed an original approach through which the sign is coupled with cultural facts. However, it was not until 2004 that the first hieroglyphic palaeography program was launched by D. Meeks. There is, however, an area that escapes hieroglyphic palaeography: that of the cursive hieroglyphics. This is the reason why U. Verhoeven has just launched an inventory program of hieratic and hieroglyphic cursive signs.Only the analysis of the different stages of execution of a monumental inscription—from the cursive sign to the carved and painted sign—will make it possible to understand the work of scribes. Hieroglyphic palaeography will then be able to make up for lost time.
直到最近,象形文字才被系统地研究过。早期的作品是从艺术史的角度来考虑象形文字的。在20世纪70年代,由于H. G. Fischer的出现,新的观点出现了,他开发了一种原始的方法,通过这种方法,标志与文化事实相结合。然而,直到2004年,第一个象形文字古生物学项目才由米克斯博士发起。然而,有一个领域逃脱了象形文字古学:草书象形文字。这就是为什么U. Verhoeven刚刚启动了一项象形和草书符号的清单计划。只有分析铭文制作的不同阶段——从草书到雕刻和绘画——才能使我们有可能了解抄写员的工作。象形文字古文字将能够弥补失去的时间。