AI-Based Compression: A New Unintended Counter Attack on JPEG-Related Image Forensic Detectors?

Alexandre Berthet, J. Dugelay
{"title":"AI-Based Compression: A New Unintended Counter Attack on JPEG-Related Image Forensic Detectors?","authors":"Alexandre Berthet, J. Dugelay","doi":"10.1109/ICIP46576.2022.9897697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The detection of forged images is an important topic in digital image forensics. There are two main types of forgery: copy-move and splicing. These forgeries are created with image editors that apply JPEG compression by default, when saving the forged images. As a result, the authentic and falsified areas have different compression statistics, including histograms of DCT coefficients that show inconsistencies in the case of double JPEG compression. Therefore, the detection of double JPEG compression (DJPEG-C) is an important topic for JPEG-related image forensic detectors. Since the emergence of deep learning in image processing, AI-based compression methods have been proposed. This paper is the first to consider AI-based compression with digital image analysis tools. The objective is to understand whether AI-based compression can be a new unintended counter-attack for JPEG-related image forensic detectors. To verify our hypothesis, we selected the best detector to date, an AI-based compression method and the Casia v2 database that contains both splicing and copy-move (all publicly available). We focused our experiment on benign post-processing operations: AI-based and JPEG recompressions (with different quality levels). The evaluation is performed using different metrics (average precision, F1 score and accuracy, PSNR, SSIM) to take into account both the impact on detection and image quality. At similar image quality, AI-based recompression achieves a decrease in performance at least twice higher than JPEG, while preserving high visual image quality. Thus, AI-based compression is a new unintended counter-attack, which can no longer be ignored in future studies on image forensic detectors.","PeriodicalId":387035,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP46576.2022.9897697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The detection of forged images is an important topic in digital image forensics. There are two main types of forgery: copy-move and splicing. These forgeries are created with image editors that apply JPEG compression by default, when saving the forged images. As a result, the authentic and falsified areas have different compression statistics, including histograms of DCT coefficients that show inconsistencies in the case of double JPEG compression. Therefore, the detection of double JPEG compression (DJPEG-C) is an important topic for JPEG-related image forensic detectors. Since the emergence of deep learning in image processing, AI-based compression methods have been proposed. This paper is the first to consider AI-based compression with digital image analysis tools. The objective is to understand whether AI-based compression can be a new unintended counter-attack for JPEG-related image forensic detectors. To verify our hypothesis, we selected the best detector to date, an AI-based compression method and the Casia v2 database that contains both splicing and copy-move (all publicly available). We focused our experiment on benign post-processing operations: AI-based and JPEG recompressions (with different quality levels). The evaluation is performed using different metrics (average precision, F1 score and accuracy, PSNR, SSIM) to take into account both the impact on detection and image quality. At similar image quality, AI-based recompression achieves a decrease in performance at least twice higher than JPEG, while preserving high visual image quality. Thus, AI-based compression is a new unintended counter-attack, which can no longer be ignored in future studies on image forensic detectors.
基于人工智能的压缩:对jpeg相关图像取证检测器的一种新的意外反击?
伪造图像的检测是数字图像取证中的一个重要课题。有两种主要的伪造类型:复制-移动和拼接。这些伪造的图像是用图像编辑器创建的,在保存伪造的图像时,默认情况下应用JPEG压缩。因此,真实区域和伪造区域具有不同的压缩统计数据,包括在双JPEG压缩情况下显示不一致的DCT系数直方图。因此,双JPEG压缩检测(DJPEG-C)是JPEG相关图像取证检测器的一个重要课题。自从深度学习在图像处理中出现以来,基于人工智能的压缩方法被提出。本文是第一个考虑基于人工智能的压缩与数字图像分析工具。目的是了解基于人工智能的压缩是否可以成为与jpeg相关的图像取证检测器的一种新的意外反击。为了验证我们的假设,我们选择了迄今为止最好的检测器,一种基于人工智能的压缩方法和Casia v2数据库,其中包含拼接和复制移动(所有这些都是公开可用的)。我们将实验重点放在良性的后处理操作上:基于ai和JPEG的再压缩(不同质量级别)。评估使用不同的指标(平均精度,F1分数和精度,PSNR, SSIM)来考虑对检测和图像质量的影响。在类似的图像质量下,基于人工智能的再压缩在保持高视觉图像质量的同时,其性能下降至少是JPEG的两倍。因此,基于人工智能的压缩是一种新的非预期反击,在未来的图像取证检测器研究中不容忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信