Portugal’s Resistance to Decolonization and the “White Redoubt” (1950–1974)

Luís Barroso
{"title":"Portugal’s Resistance to Decolonization and the “White Redoubt” (1950–1974)","authors":"Luís Barroso","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Portugal’s resistance to decolonization lasted from the mid-1950s until the fall of the regime in April 1974, and it helps to explain why Portugal fought thirteen years of war in Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea. Contrary to other colonial powers, the Portuguese rulers were not willing to accept the winds of change nor to meet the demands for the self-determination of its overseas territories that had swept Africa and Asia from the early 1950s. Several factors can explain the inflexibility of Lisbon to accept them, ranging from the ideological nature of the New State; from the strategic context of the Cold War due to the importance of the Azores islands for the United States and NATO; or from Portugal’s alliance with Great Britain. When the war broke out in Angola, and the Indian Union seized the “Portuguese India” territories in 1961, prime-minister Salazar did not receive the political support he expected from Washington and London as traditional allies.\n In early 1962, Salazar decided to strengthen relations with South Africa and Rhodesia in an attempt to maintain white rule in its overseas territories amidst a drive for independence by African nationalists, so-called “white redoubt,” that was the terminology used by the Kennedy administration to refer to the set of African countries and territories dominated by white minority governments: Angola, Mozambique, Southern Rhodesia and South Africa. Strengthened ties would aid his strategy to keep the war effort in Africa by taking advantage of the importance of Angola and Mozambique to the security of South Africa. In 1964, Salazar encouraged Ian Smith to unilaterally declare independence from Great Britain to link Angola and Mozambique to the Southern Africa Security Complex led by South Africa, despite widespread criticism of the apartheid in the United Nations (UN). Concurrently, Lisbon tried to seduce Hastings Banda and Kenneth Kaunda in expelling the liberation movements from Malawi and Zambia in exchange for granting transit facilities to ease the international pressure with regards to its colonial policy.\n Following several years of military collaboration, in October 1970, Portugal, South Africa, and Rhodesia established a military alliance codenamed “Exercise ALCORA,” which aimed to coordinate the global efforts against the insurgency in Southern Africa. Portugal used the ALCORA to obtain substantial aid in the form of military equipment and financial support, which Portugal needed to keep the war effort in the three African territories. In early 1974, Caetano channeled the South African loan to prevent a significant setback in Guinea, because if it were lost, Mozambique and Angola would follow, and consequently the regime.","PeriodicalId":166397,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History","volume":"291 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Portugal’s resistance to decolonization lasted from the mid-1950s until the fall of the regime in April 1974, and it helps to explain why Portugal fought thirteen years of war in Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea. Contrary to other colonial powers, the Portuguese rulers were not willing to accept the winds of change nor to meet the demands for the self-determination of its overseas territories that had swept Africa and Asia from the early 1950s. Several factors can explain the inflexibility of Lisbon to accept them, ranging from the ideological nature of the New State; from the strategic context of the Cold War due to the importance of the Azores islands for the United States and NATO; or from Portugal’s alliance with Great Britain. When the war broke out in Angola, and the Indian Union seized the “Portuguese India” territories in 1961, prime-minister Salazar did not receive the political support he expected from Washington and London as traditional allies. In early 1962, Salazar decided to strengthen relations with South Africa and Rhodesia in an attempt to maintain white rule in its overseas territories amidst a drive for independence by African nationalists, so-called “white redoubt,” that was the terminology used by the Kennedy administration to refer to the set of African countries and territories dominated by white minority governments: Angola, Mozambique, Southern Rhodesia and South Africa. Strengthened ties would aid his strategy to keep the war effort in Africa by taking advantage of the importance of Angola and Mozambique to the security of South Africa. In 1964, Salazar encouraged Ian Smith to unilaterally declare independence from Great Britain to link Angola and Mozambique to the Southern Africa Security Complex led by South Africa, despite widespread criticism of the apartheid in the United Nations (UN). Concurrently, Lisbon tried to seduce Hastings Banda and Kenneth Kaunda in expelling the liberation movements from Malawi and Zambia in exchange for granting transit facilities to ease the international pressure with regards to its colonial policy. Following several years of military collaboration, in October 1970, Portugal, South Africa, and Rhodesia established a military alliance codenamed “Exercise ALCORA,” which aimed to coordinate the global efforts against the insurgency in Southern Africa. Portugal used the ALCORA to obtain substantial aid in the form of military equipment and financial support, which Portugal needed to keep the war effort in the three African territories. In early 1974, Caetano channeled the South African loan to prevent a significant setback in Guinea, because if it were lost, Mozambique and Angola would follow, and consequently the regime.
葡萄牙抵抗非殖民化与“白色堡垒”(1950-1974)
葡萄牙对非殖民化的抵抗从20世纪50年代中期持续到1974年4月政权倒台,这有助于解释为什么葡萄牙在安哥拉、莫桑比克和几内亚打了13年的战争。与其他殖民列强相反,葡萄牙统治者不愿意接受变革之风,也不愿意满足自1950年代初以来席卷非洲和亚洲的海外领土自决的要求。有几个因素可以解释里斯本不愿接受它们的原因,从新国家的意识形态性质;从冷战的战略背景来看,由于亚速尔群岛对美国和北约的重要性;或者葡萄牙与英国的联盟。当安哥拉爆发战争,印度联盟于1961年夺取了“葡属印度”的领土时,萨拉查总理并没有从作为传统盟友的华盛顿和伦敦那里得到他所期望的政治支持。1962年初,萨拉查决定加强与南非和罗得西亚的关系,试图在非洲民族主义者的独立运动中维持白人在其海外领土上的统治,所谓的“白人堡垒”,这是肯尼迪政府使用的术语,指的是由白人少数政府统治的非洲国家和地区:安哥拉、莫桑比克、南罗得西亚和南非。加强两国关系将有助于他利用安哥拉和莫桑比克对南非安全的重要性,使战争继续在非洲进行。1964年,萨拉查鼓励伊恩·史密斯单方面宣布从英国独立,将安哥拉和莫桑比克与南非领导的南部非洲安全联合体联系起来,尽管联合国对种族隔离制度提出了广泛的批评。同时,里斯本试图引诱黑斯廷斯·班达和肯尼斯·卡翁达将解放运动驱逐出马拉维和赞比亚,以换取提供过境设施,以减轻国际上对其殖民政策的压力。经过几年的军事合作,1970年10月,葡萄牙、南非和罗得西亚建立了一个代号为“ALCORA演习”的军事联盟,旨在协调全球打击南部非洲叛乱的努力。葡萄牙利用该法案获得了大量的军事装备和财政支持,葡萄牙需要这些物资来维持在这三个非洲领土上的战争。1974年初,卡埃塔诺为防止几内亚遭受重大挫折而提供了南非的贷款,因为如果这笔贷款丢失,莫桑比克和安哥拉将紧随其后,最终导致几内亚政权垮台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信