Legal issues of Attribution for public facilities in the National Land Planning and Utilization Act

Hae-young Jeong
{"title":"Legal issues of Attribution for public facilities in the National Land Planning and Utilization Act","authors":"Hae-young Jeong","doi":"10.55029/kabl.2022.44.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attribution system for public facilities is a regulations determining the ownership of public facilities for the installation of public facilities and its efficient management, governing the appropriate burden of public facilities installation costs The legal characteristic of this system is that, in the automatic condemnation, there is a change in real rights according to the provisions of the law, and in the case of gratuitous transfer, administrative property can be immediately disposed of without going through the abolition procedure. The basic form of the legal system is when a person who has obtained permission for development activities installs public facilities, and depending on whether the person who has obtained the permit is an administrative agency or not, it is classified into automatic condemnation and gratuitous transfer. The automatic condemnation is applied when functional substitutability between new public facilities and existing public facilities is recognized, so there is no special legal problem. However, in the case of gratuitous transfer, the licensed person is in a legally unstable state because it is decided at the discretion of administrative agency whether the licensed person can receive the gratuitous transfer. According to the purpose of the system, it is reasonable to interpret it as having to transfer existing public facilities to the licensed person unless there are special circumstances. Despite the need to secure essential public facilities, this system creates a considerable burden on the project operator. However, there are many unclear parts in relation to the endowment, the requirements and effects for applying the system. This causes various problems in practice. Therefore, it is necessary to various discussions and legislative efforts to solve these practical problems.","PeriodicalId":399431,"journal":{"name":"Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55029/kabl.2022.44.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attribution system for public facilities is a regulations determining the ownership of public facilities for the installation of public facilities and its efficient management, governing the appropriate burden of public facilities installation costs The legal characteristic of this system is that, in the automatic condemnation, there is a change in real rights according to the provisions of the law, and in the case of gratuitous transfer, administrative property can be immediately disposed of without going through the abolition procedure. The basic form of the legal system is when a person who has obtained permission for development activities installs public facilities, and depending on whether the person who has obtained the permit is an administrative agency or not, it is classified into automatic condemnation and gratuitous transfer. The automatic condemnation is applied when functional substitutability between new public facilities and existing public facilities is recognized, so there is no special legal problem. However, in the case of gratuitous transfer, the licensed person is in a legally unstable state because it is decided at the discretion of administrative agency whether the licensed person can receive the gratuitous transfer. According to the purpose of the system, it is reasonable to interpret it as having to transfer existing public facilities to the licensed person unless there are special circumstances. Despite the need to secure essential public facilities, this system creates a considerable burden on the project operator. However, there are many unclear parts in relation to the endowment, the requirements and effects for applying the system. This causes various problems in practice. Therefore, it is necessary to various discussions and legislative efforts to solve these practical problems.
国土规划利用法中公共设施归属的法律问题
公共设施归属制度是确定公共设施安装的所有权及其有效管理,规范公共设施安装费用的适当负担的一项规定。该制度的法律特征是,在自动定罪中,根据法律规定发生物权的变化,在无偿转让的情况下,行政财产可以不经过废除程序立即处理。法律制度的基本形式是,获得开发活动许可的人设置公共设施,根据获得许可的人是否是行政机关,分为自动谴责和无偿转让。自动定罪适用于新公共设施与现有公共设施之间功能可替代性的认定,不存在特殊的法律问题。然而,在无偿转让的情况下,被许可人处于法律不稳定状态,因为行政机关可以自由决定被许可人是否可以接受无偿转让。根据该制度的目的,除非有特殊情况,否则可以合理地解释为必须将现有的公共设施转让给持牌人。尽管需要确保基本的公共设施,但这一制度给项目运营商带来了相当大的负担。但是,在有关养老保险制度实施的要求和效果等方面,还存在许多不明确的地方。这在实践中造成了各种各样的问题。因此,有必要通过各种讨论和立法努力来解决这些现实问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信