Factors that predict evidence use by Australian perioperative nurses

J. Duff, M. Butler, M. Davies, Robyn Williams, Jannelle Carlile
{"title":"Factors that predict evidence use by Australian perioperative nurses","authors":"J. Duff, M. Butler, M. Davies, Robyn Williams, Jannelle Carlile","doi":"10.26550/2209-1092.1004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence-based practice has been demonstrated to positively \nimpact patient outcomes; unfortunately, there are many factors \nthat hinder the use of research evidence by healthcare clinicians. \nOur previous study reported a multisite survey assessing \nAustralian perioperative nurses knowledge, practice, attitude, and \nperceived barriers to evidence use. This subsequent analysis used \nunivariate and multivariate binary logistic regression with odds \nratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare individual \nnurse and organisational characteristics with high evidencebased \npractice (EBP) use. Two individual nurse characteristics \nfound to be related to EBP were postgraduate qualifications (OR \n1.69, 95% CI 1.07–2.6, p=0.02) and previous research experience \n(OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6–2.4, p=0.01). Organisational characteristics \nrelated to EBP included access to the internet (OR 2.04, 95% CI \n1.3–3.0, p=0.001) and access to ongoing EBP education (OR 1.6, \n95% CI 1.1–2.5, p=0.01). Previous research experience (OR 1.6, 95% \nCI 1.0–2.3, p=0.01) was the only independent predictor of EBP. \nGiven our finding, we suggest that considerably greater effort be \nmade to facilitate nurses involvement in research studies in the \nperioperative setting.","PeriodicalId":127501,"journal":{"name":"ACORN: the journal of perioperative nursing in Australia","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACORN: the journal of perioperative nursing in Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26550/2209-1092.1004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Evidence-based practice has been demonstrated to positively impact patient outcomes; unfortunately, there are many factors that hinder the use of research evidence by healthcare clinicians. Our previous study reported a multisite survey assessing Australian perioperative nurses knowledge, practice, attitude, and perceived barriers to evidence use. This subsequent analysis used univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare individual nurse and organisational characteristics with high evidencebased practice (EBP) use. Two individual nurse characteristics found to be related to EBP were postgraduate qualifications (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.07–2.6, p=0.02) and previous research experience (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6–2.4, p=0.01). Organisational characteristics related to EBP included access to the internet (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.3–3.0, p=0.001) and access to ongoing EBP education (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–2.5, p=0.01). Previous research experience (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.3, p=0.01) was the only independent predictor of EBP. Given our finding, we suggest that considerably greater effort be made to facilitate nurses involvement in research studies in the perioperative setting.
预测澳大利亚围手术期护士证据使用的因素
循证实践已被证明对患者预后有积极影响;不幸的是,有许多因素阻碍了医疗保健临床医生使用研究证据。我们之前的研究报告了一项多地点调查,评估了澳大利亚围手术期护士的知识、实践、态度和对证据使用的感知障碍。随后的分析使用单变量和多变量二元逻辑回归,优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)来比较护士个人和高循证实践(EBP)使用的组织特征。与EBP相关的两个护士个体特征是研究生学历(OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.07-2.6, p=0.02)和以前的研究经历(OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.4, p=0.01)。与EBP相关的组织特征包括访问互联网(OR为2.04,95% CI为1.3-3.0,p=0.001)和接受持续的EBP教育(OR为1.6,95% CI为1.1-2.5,p=0.01)。既往研究经验(OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.3, p=0.01)是EBP的唯一独立预测因子。鉴于我们的发现,我们建议做出更大的努力来促进护士参与围手术期的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信