The Agrihood Design: Valuation of Ecosystem Services for NbS Visions in Peri-urban Housing Estate Development, Bangkok, Thailand

K. Irvine, Fa Likitswat, Alisa Sahavacharin, Asan Suwanarit, Tararat Lertwarapornpong, D. Chitwatkulsiri
{"title":"The Agrihood Design: Valuation of Ecosystem Services for NbS Visions in Peri-urban Housing Estate Development, Bangkok, Thailand","authors":"K. Irvine, Fa Likitswat, Alisa Sahavacharin, Asan Suwanarit, Tararat Lertwarapornpong, D. Chitwatkulsiri","doi":"10.56261/jars.v21.257520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nNature-based Solution (NbS) designs increasingly are being implemented to reduce environmental impacts of urban development and enhance community resiliency to disruptions ranging from floods to climate change to Covid-19. But, the question remains, how do we assess the ecosystem service benefits provided by competing NbS designs in order to optimize such benefits? As such, the objective of this study was to develop and trial an assessment approach for the valuation of ecosystem services in a peri-urban area of Bangkok, Thailand. In our evaluations we considered the ecosystem service benefits of: i) water yield; ii) sediment yield; iii) nutrient yield; iv) carbon sequestration; v) urban heat island mitigation; vi) crop production; vii) habitat quality; and viii) aesthetics. Our ecosystem services valuation approach was tested using three case studies in peri-urban Bangkok, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani: i) an existing new single detached housing development in the area; ii) an area in its currently undeveloped, open and scrub forest state; and iii) the same area as (ii), but theoretically developed using an Agrihood design concept. The valuation approach included a combination of mathematical modeling for the water, sediment, and nutrient yield ecosystem services and an empirical, data-driven approach for urban cooling, carbon sequestering, crop production, habitat quality, and aesthetics. While the existing housing development design was meant to be relatively green and nature-oriented, the Agrihood design outperformed it in every ecosystem service category, including habitat quality and aesthetics. The Agrihood design also had lower sediment and nutrient yields and mean concentrations as compared to current (natural) conditions at the site, which is attributed to the inclusion of constructed wetlands in the design for the main drainage canal. This work represents a good preliminary step in establishing a local scale ecosystem services valuation framework for urban areas in a tropical climate, but additional refinements to the indicator determinations are needed.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":428713,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56261/jars.v21.257520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Nature-based Solution (NbS) designs increasingly are being implemented to reduce environmental impacts of urban development and enhance community resiliency to disruptions ranging from floods to climate change to Covid-19. But, the question remains, how do we assess the ecosystem service benefits provided by competing NbS designs in order to optimize such benefits? As such, the objective of this study was to develop and trial an assessment approach for the valuation of ecosystem services in a peri-urban area of Bangkok, Thailand. In our evaluations we considered the ecosystem service benefits of: i) water yield; ii) sediment yield; iii) nutrient yield; iv) carbon sequestration; v) urban heat island mitigation; vi) crop production; vii) habitat quality; and viii) aesthetics. Our ecosystem services valuation approach was tested using three case studies in peri-urban Bangkok, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani: i) an existing new single detached housing development in the area; ii) an area in its currently undeveloped, open and scrub forest state; and iii) the same area as (ii), but theoretically developed using an Agrihood design concept. The valuation approach included a combination of mathematical modeling for the water, sediment, and nutrient yield ecosystem services and an empirical, data-driven approach for urban cooling, carbon sequestering, crop production, habitat quality, and aesthetics. While the existing housing development design was meant to be relatively green and nature-oriented, the Agrihood design outperformed it in every ecosystem service category, including habitat quality and aesthetics. The Agrihood design also had lower sediment and nutrient yields and mean concentrations as compared to current (natural) conditions at the site, which is attributed to the inclusion of constructed wetlands in the design for the main drainage canal. This work represents a good preliminary step in establishing a local scale ecosystem services valuation framework for urban areas in a tropical climate, but additional refinements to the indicator determinations are needed.
农业设计:NbS在城市周边住宅开发中的生态系统服务价值评估,曼谷,泰国
基于自然的解决方案(NbS)设计越来越多地得到实施,以减少城市发展对环境的影响,并增强社区对洪水、气候变化和2019冠状病毒病等各种破坏的抵御能力。但是,问题仍然存在,我们如何评估竞争的NbS设计提供的生态系统服务效益,以优化这些效益?因此,本研究的目的是开发和试验一种评估方法,以评估泰国曼谷城郊地区的生态系统服务。在我们的评估中,我们考虑了生态系统服务效益:i)水量;Ii)产沙量;Iii)养分产量;Iv)固碳;(五)城市热岛缓解;Vi)作物生产;Vii)生境质素;第八,美学。我们的生态系统服务评估方法在曼谷城郊、Khlong Luang和Pathum Thani进行了三个案例研究:i)该地区现有的新独立住宅开发;Ii)现属未开发、开阔及矮林的地区;iii)与(ii)相同的区域,但理论上使用农业设计概念进行开发。评估方法包括水、沉积物和养分产量生态系统服务的数学模型,以及城市冷却、碳封存、作物生产、栖息地质量和美学的经验数据驱动方法。虽然现有的住房开发设计是相对绿色和自然为导向的,但Agrihood的设计在每个生态系统服务类别中都优于它,包括栖息地质量和美学。与目前的(自然)条件相比,Agrihood设计还具有更低的沉积物和养分产量以及平均浓度,这要归功于在主要排水渠的设计中包含了人工湿地。这项工作为建立热带气候下城市地区的地方尺度生态系统服务评估框架迈出了良好的初步步骤,但还需要进一步完善指标确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信