Performance assessment of indoor location technologies

R. Challamel, P. Tomé, D. Harmer, S. Beauregard
{"title":"Performance assessment of indoor location technologies","authors":"R. Challamel, P. Tomé, D. Harmer, S. Beauregard","doi":"10.1109/PLANS.2008.4569982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Location based services (LBS) are currently enjoying a strong success as a result of well-proven GNSS positioning technology (GPS, assisted GPS). However, the future generation of LBS will have to address the challenge of accurate and reliable indoor localization. In fact, this need has already been clearly expressed by various communities of professional end users (firemen, security forces, etc.) in the context of LIAISON and WearlTork projects funded by the European community's sixth framework program. In order to assess the performance of the location technologies most suited to cope with the stringent constraints of indoor LBSs oriented towards the needs of professional users, in particular those of the firemen, a \"location trial\" composed of several test scenarios was organized, putting face to face in a common systematic reference the following positioning technologies: - Inertial MEMS coupled with GNSS, using two different algorithmic approaches for the inertial component: signal pattern recognition associated with human biomechanical walking models and conventional inertial navigation using zero velocity updates at footfalls; - UWB radio-based localization prototype system. The results from this \"location trial\" show that inertial technology achieves interesting performances (stand-alone positioning accuracy better than 3 meters RMS after 4 minutes and less than 6 meters RMS after 8 minutes of continuous pedestrian walk), but still lacks robustness against specific environmental conditions (in particular magnetic disturbances affecting orientation estimation) and users' walking behavior. As for the UWB prototype system, it provides good positioning accuracy (less than 3 meters RMS) for nominal operational conditions, but but it can experience severe degradation under certain circumstances. By highlighting the pros and cons of each technology under a common framework, this \"location trial\" has provided a clearer understanding how their seamless combination can realistically address all users' needs: accuracy, reliability, robustness, coverage, deployability and wearability.","PeriodicalId":446381,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS.2008.4569982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Location based services (LBS) are currently enjoying a strong success as a result of well-proven GNSS positioning technology (GPS, assisted GPS). However, the future generation of LBS will have to address the challenge of accurate and reliable indoor localization. In fact, this need has already been clearly expressed by various communities of professional end users (firemen, security forces, etc.) in the context of LIAISON and WearlTork projects funded by the European community's sixth framework program. In order to assess the performance of the location technologies most suited to cope with the stringent constraints of indoor LBSs oriented towards the needs of professional users, in particular those of the firemen, a "location trial" composed of several test scenarios was organized, putting face to face in a common systematic reference the following positioning technologies: - Inertial MEMS coupled with GNSS, using two different algorithmic approaches for the inertial component: signal pattern recognition associated with human biomechanical walking models and conventional inertial navigation using zero velocity updates at footfalls; - UWB radio-based localization prototype system. The results from this "location trial" show that inertial technology achieves interesting performances (stand-alone positioning accuracy better than 3 meters RMS after 4 minutes and less than 6 meters RMS after 8 minutes of continuous pedestrian walk), but still lacks robustness against specific environmental conditions (in particular magnetic disturbances affecting orientation estimation) and users' walking behavior. As for the UWB prototype system, it provides good positioning accuracy (less than 3 meters RMS) for nominal operational conditions, but but it can experience severe degradation under certain circumstances. By highlighting the pros and cons of each technology under a common framework, this "location trial" has provided a clearer understanding how their seamless combination can realistically address all users' needs: accuracy, reliability, robustness, coverage, deployability and wearability.
室内定位技术的性能评估
由于成熟的GNSS定位技术(GPS,辅助GPS),基于位置的服务(LBS)目前取得了巨大的成功。然而,未来一代的LBS将不得不解决准确可靠的室内定位的挑战。事实上,在欧洲共同体第六个框架计划资助的LIAISON和WearlTork项目中,各种专业最终用户社区(消防员、安全部队等)已经明确表达了这一需求。为了评估最适合应对专业用户(特别是消防员)需求的室内lbs严格限制的定位技术的性能,组织了一个由几个测试场景组成的“定位试验”,将以下定位技术面对面地放在一个共同的系统参考中:-惯性MEMS与GNSS耦合,使用两种不同的惯性组件算法方法:信号模式识别与人类生物力学步行模型和传统惯性导航使用零速度更新的脚步声-基于超宽带无线电的定位原型系统。这次“定位试验”的结果表明,惯性技术取得了令人感兴趣的性能(连续步行4分钟后单机定位精度优于3米RMS,连续步行8分钟后定位精度低于6米RMS),但对特定环境条件(特别是影响方向估计的磁干扰)和用户步行行为的鲁棒性仍然不足。对于UWB原型系统,它在标称运行条件下提供了良好的定位精度(RMS小于3米),但在某些情况下可能会出现严重的退化。通过在一个共同的框架下突出每种技术的优缺点,这次“定位试验”让人们更清楚地了解了它们的无缝组合如何能够现实地满足所有用户的需求:准确性、可靠性、稳健性、覆盖范围、可部署性和可穿戴性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信