A Quasi-moment-method Modelling of Energy Demand Forecasting

S. Adekola, Ayorinde Ayotunde, H. Muhammed, F. Okewole, A. Ike Mowete
{"title":"A Quasi-moment-method Modelling of Energy Demand Forecasting","authors":"S. Adekola, Ayorinde Ayotunde, H. Muhammed, F. Okewole, A. Ike Mowete","doi":"10.11113/elektrika.v22n1.427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a novel approach to the modelling of electrical energy demand forecasting, based on the Quasi-Moment-Method (QMM). The technique, using historical energy consumption/demand data, essentially calibrates nominated ‘base’ models (in this case, nominal Harvey and Autoregressive models) to provide significantly better performing models. In addition to the novelty of the use of QMM, the paper identifies hitherto unreported singularities of the generic Harvey / logistic model, through which a simple, but remarkably pivotal modification is proposed, prior to the model’s use as base model in QMM calibration schemes. The treatment of the ‘Harvey singularities’ informed a similar and equally significant modification of the Autoregressive model utilized in the paper. For the purposes of validation and performance evaluation, computational results due to the QMM models are compared with corresponding results reported in three different journal publications, which utilized the Harvey and Autoregressive models in conventional regression schemes. And in terms of the usual model performance metrics (including Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and Root Mean Square Percentage Error (RMSPE)), the results very clearly demonstrate the superiority of the QMM models for both energy demand prediction and forecasting. As representative examples, a QMM-calibrated Harvey model recorded an RMSE value of 495.45dB for total energy consumption prediction, as against 618.60dB obtained for the corresponding nominal Harvey model: and for the Autoregressive case, RMSE was obtained as 131.35dB for QMM model’s prediction of peak load demand, compared with the 173.40dB due to the nominal model.","PeriodicalId":312612,"journal":{"name":"ELEKTRIKA- Journal of Electrical Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELEKTRIKA- Journal of Electrical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/elektrika.v22n1.427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a novel approach to the modelling of electrical energy demand forecasting, based on the Quasi-Moment-Method (QMM). The technique, using historical energy consumption/demand data, essentially calibrates nominated ‘base’ models (in this case, nominal Harvey and Autoregressive models) to provide significantly better performing models. In addition to the novelty of the use of QMM, the paper identifies hitherto unreported singularities of the generic Harvey / logistic model, through which a simple, but remarkably pivotal modification is proposed, prior to the model’s use as base model in QMM calibration schemes. The treatment of the ‘Harvey singularities’ informed a similar and equally significant modification of the Autoregressive model utilized in the paper. For the purposes of validation and performance evaluation, computational results due to the QMM models are compared with corresponding results reported in three different journal publications, which utilized the Harvey and Autoregressive models in conventional regression schemes. And in terms of the usual model performance metrics (including Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and Root Mean Square Percentage Error (RMSPE)), the results very clearly demonstrate the superiority of the QMM models for both energy demand prediction and forecasting. As representative examples, a QMM-calibrated Harvey model recorded an RMSE value of 495.45dB for total energy consumption prediction, as against 618.60dB obtained for the corresponding nominal Harvey model: and for the Autoregressive case, RMSE was obtained as 131.35dB for QMM model’s prediction of peak load demand, compared with the 173.40dB due to the nominal model.
能源需求预测的准矩法模型
本文提出了一种基于准矩法(QMM)的电力需求预测建模新方法。该技术使用历史能源消耗/需求数据,从本质上校准指定的“基础”模型(在这种情况下,名义哈维模型和自回归模型),以提供显着更好的性能模型。除了使用QMM的新颖性之外,本文还确定了迄今为止未报道的通用Harvey / logistic模型的奇异性,通过该模型提出了一个简单但非常关键的修改,然后将该模型用作QMM校准方案中的基本模型。对“哈维奇点”的处理告知了本文中使用的自回归模型的类似且同样重要的修改。为了验证和性能评价,将QMM模型的计算结果与在常规回归方案中使用Harvey模型和Autoregressive模型的三种不同期刊出版物的相应结果进行了比较。在常用的模型性能指标(包括平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)和均方根百分比误差(RMSPE))方面,结果非常清楚地表明了QMM模型在能源需求预测和预测方面的优越性。作为代表性的例子,QMM校准的Harvey模型对总能耗预测的RMSE值为495.45dB,而对应的标称Harvey模型的RMSE值为618.60dB;对于Autoregressive模型,QMM模型对峰值负荷需求预测的RMSE值为131.35dB,而标称模型的RMSE值为173.40dB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信