The Russian Aggression against Ukraine – Putin and His ‘Legality Claims’

Paulina Starski, F. Arndt
{"title":"The Russian Aggression against Ukraine – Putin and His ‘Legality Claims’","authors":"Paulina Starski, F. Arndt","doi":"10.1163/18757413_02501025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trying to reconcile the commemoration of the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law with the ongoing brutal Russian invasion into Ukraine since 24 February 2022, this contribution will attempt to analyse the impact of the various claims put forward by President Vladimir Putin as to the ‘legality’ of the Russian aggression on the ius contra bellum regime as enshrined in the UN Charter. To this end, the authors will, first, sketch the distorted pseudohistorical narrative purported by Putin which gives his ‘legality claims’ context. Second, this contribution will take Putin’s ‘legality claims’ deliberately at face value in order to subject them to a legal assessment. In doing so, the authors attempt to demonstrate that the plentiful doctrinal controversies still permeating the discourse on the ius contra bellum regime have little bearing on the (in)validity of the proposed justifications. Third, the authors will address what is at stake for the modern international order based on the UN Charter in face of the blatantly illegal use of force on the part of Russia against Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":167092,"journal":{"name":"Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18757413_02501025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trying to reconcile the commemoration of the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law with the ongoing brutal Russian invasion into Ukraine since 24 February 2022, this contribution will attempt to analyse the impact of the various claims put forward by President Vladimir Putin as to the ‘legality’ of the Russian aggression on the ius contra bellum regime as enshrined in the UN Charter. To this end, the authors will, first, sketch the distorted pseudohistorical narrative purported by Putin which gives his ‘legality claims’ context. Second, this contribution will take Putin’s ‘legality claims’ deliberately at face value in order to subject them to a legal assessment. In doing so, the authors attempt to demonstrate that the plentiful doctrinal controversies still permeating the discourse on the ius contra bellum regime have little bearing on the (in)validity of the proposed justifications. Third, the authors will address what is at stake for the modern international order based on the UN Charter in face of the blatantly illegal use of force on the part of Russia against Ukraine.
俄罗斯入侵乌克兰——普京及其“合法性主张”
为了调和《马克斯·普朗克联合国法年鉴》25周年纪念活动与俄罗斯自2022年2月24日以来对乌克兰的持续野蛮入侵,本文将试图分析弗拉基米尔·普京总统提出的各种主张对《联合国宪章》所载的俄罗斯侵略“合法性”的影响。为此,作者将首先概述普京所声称的扭曲的伪历史叙事,这为他的“合法性主张”提供了背景。其次,这篇文章将故意把普京的“合法性主张”从表面上看,以便对其进行法律评估。在这样做的过程中,作者试图证明,大量的理论争议仍然渗透在“反对战争”制度的话语中,这与所提出的理由的有效性几乎没有关系。第三,两位作者将探讨,面对俄罗斯对乌克兰公然非法使用武力的行为,基于《联合国宪章》(UN Charter)的现代国际秩序面临的威胁是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信