The Place of Skepticism in the 21st Century Gnoseological Debate: Selecting Logical Positivism and Postmodernism

Elias Ifeanyi E. Uzoigwe
{"title":"The Place of Skepticism in the 21st Century Gnoseological Debate: Selecting Logical Positivism and Postmodernism","authors":"Elias Ifeanyi E. Uzoigwe","doi":"10.22158/wjeh.v4n1p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is centered on The Place of Skepticism in the 21st Century Gnoseological Debate: Selecting Logical Positivism and Postmodernism. Within the context of Western philosophy, skepticism, which arguably began in the ancient times with the likes of Gorgias neither ends with the Contra Academicos of St. Augustine nor with Kant’s noumena as some scholars argued. Skepticism is an indispensable part of epistemic discourse that cuts across diverse ages of philosophical discipline ranging from the ancient, medieval, modern, and contemporary; and also permeates all the branches of philosophy. The philosophical postulates of the logical positivists who unequivocally argued that any proposition that cannot be subjected to their verification principle is meaningless, was occasioned by skepticism. The postmodernist philosophers’ argument against objective knowledge, grand totalizing, and their downplaying of foundationalism, was orchestrated by skepticism. It is the position of this study that skepticism is not only a continuum, but most importantly, the episteme-vitae (the life-wire of epistemology). As a necessary evil in the philosophical discipline skepticism is an inevitable driving force in the 21st century gnoseological debate, and instrumentum laboris (instrument of labour) in the hands of philosophers. The research methods employed in this work include: analytic, contextual, historical, and textual.","PeriodicalId":228342,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Education and Humanities","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Education and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/wjeh.v4n1p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is centered on The Place of Skepticism in the 21st Century Gnoseological Debate: Selecting Logical Positivism and Postmodernism. Within the context of Western philosophy, skepticism, which arguably began in the ancient times with the likes of Gorgias neither ends with the Contra Academicos of St. Augustine nor with Kant’s noumena as some scholars argued. Skepticism is an indispensable part of epistemic discourse that cuts across diverse ages of philosophical discipline ranging from the ancient, medieval, modern, and contemporary; and also permeates all the branches of philosophy. The philosophical postulates of the logical positivists who unequivocally argued that any proposition that cannot be subjected to their verification principle is meaningless, was occasioned by skepticism. The postmodernist philosophers’ argument against objective knowledge, grand totalizing, and their downplaying of foundationalism, was orchestrated by skepticism. It is the position of this study that skepticism is not only a continuum, but most importantly, the episteme-vitae (the life-wire of epistemology). As a necessary evil in the philosophical discipline skepticism is an inevitable driving force in the 21st century gnoseological debate, and instrumentum laboris (instrument of labour) in the hands of philosophers. The research methods employed in this work include: analytic, contextual, historical, and textual.
怀疑主义在21世纪灵知论辩论中的地位:选择逻辑实证主义与后现代主义
本研究以“怀疑主义在21世纪灵知论辩论中的地位:选择逻辑实证主义与后现代主义”为中心。在西方哲学的背景下,怀疑主义,可以说是始于古戈尔吉亚之类的人,而不是结束于圣奥古斯丁的反学院,也不是结束于一些学者所争论的康德的本体。怀疑主义是认知话语中不可或缺的一部分,它跨越了从古代、中世纪、现代到当代的不同时代的哲学学科;也渗透到哲学的各个分支。逻辑实证主义者的哲学假设毫不含糊地认为,任何命题,不能服从他们的验证原则是没有意义的,是由怀疑主义引起的。后现代主义哲学家反对客观知识、宏大的总体性和对基础主义的轻视,都是由怀疑主义精心策划的。本研究的立场是,怀疑主义不仅是一个连续体,而且最重要的是,它是认识论的生命(认识论的生命线)。作为哲学学科中不可避免的恶,怀疑主义是21世纪灵知学辩论中不可避免的驱动力,也是哲学家手中的劳动工具。在这项工作中使用的研究方法包括:分析,上下文,历史和文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信