Addiction-as-a-kind hypothesis

P. Ylikoski, Samuli Pöyhönen
{"title":"Addiction-as-a-kind hypothesis","authors":"P. Ylikoski, Samuli Pöyhönen","doi":"10.7895/IJADR.V4I1.189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ylikoski, P., & Poyhonen, S. (2015). Addiction-as-a-kind hypothesis.  The International Journal Of Alcohol And Drug Research, 4 (1), 21-25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v4i1.189 The psychiatric category of addiction has recently been broadened to include new behaviors. This has prompted critical discussion about the value of a concept that covers so many different substances and activities. Many of the debates surrounding the notion of addiction stem from different views concerning what kind of a thing addiction fundamentally is. In this essay, we put forward an account that conceptualizes different addictions as sharing a cluster of relevant properties (the syndrome) that is supported by a matrix of causal mechanisms. According to this \"addiction-as-a-kind\" hypothesis, several different kinds of substance and behavioral addictions can be thought of as instantiations of the same thing—addiction. We show how a clearly articulated account of addiction can facilitate empirical research and the theoretical integration of different perspectives on addiction. The causal matrix approach provides a promising alternative to existing accounts of the nature of psychiatric disorders, the traditional disease model, and its competitors. It is a positive addition to discussions about diagnostic criteria, and sheds light on how psychiatric classification may be integrated with research done in other scientific fields. We argue that it also provides a plausible approach to understanding comorbidity.","PeriodicalId":162336,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7895/IJADR.V4I1.189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ylikoski, P., & Poyhonen, S. (2015). Addiction-as-a-kind hypothesis.  The International Journal Of Alcohol And Drug Research, 4 (1), 21-25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v4i1.189 The psychiatric category of addiction has recently been broadened to include new behaviors. This has prompted critical discussion about the value of a concept that covers so many different substances and activities. Many of the debates surrounding the notion of addiction stem from different views concerning what kind of a thing addiction fundamentally is. In this essay, we put forward an account that conceptualizes different addictions as sharing a cluster of relevant properties (the syndrome) that is supported by a matrix of causal mechanisms. According to this "addiction-as-a-kind" hypothesis, several different kinds of substance and behavioral addictions can be thought of as instantiations of the same thing—addiction. We show how a clearly articulated account of addiction can facilitate empirical research and the theoretical integration of different perspectives on addiction. The causal matrix approach provides a promising alternative to existing accounts of the nature of psychiatric disorders, the traditional disease model, and its competitors. It is a positive addition to discussions about diagnostic criteria, and sheds light on how psychiatric classification may be integrated with research done in other scientific fields. We argue that it also provides a plausible approach to understanding comorbidity.
Addiction-as-a-kind假说
Ylikoski, P., & Poyhonen, S.(2015)。Addiction-as-a-kind假说。《国际酒精和药物研究杂志》,4(1),21-25。最近,成瘾的精神病学范畴已经扩大到包括新的行为。这引发了关于一个涵盖如此多不同物质和活动的概念的价值的批判性讨论。围绕成瘾概念的许多争论源于对成瘾本质的不同看法。在这篇文章中,我们提出了一种解释,将不同的成瘾概念化为共享一组相关属性(综合症),这是由因果机制矩阵支持的。根据这种“成瘾即一种”的假设,几种不同的物质和行为成瘾可以被认为是同一事物成瘾的实例。我们展示了一个清晰的关于成瘾的描述如何促进实证研究和对成瘾不同观点的理论整合。因果矩阵的方法提供了一个有希望的替代现有的精神疾病的性质,传统的疾病模型,及其竞争对手的说法。这是对诊断标准讨论的积极补充,并阐明了如何将精神病学分类与其他科学领域的研究相结合。我们认为,它也提供了一个合理的方法来理解共病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信