Analysis of the Relation Between and Impact of Public Service Media and Private Media

R. Nielsen, R. Fletcher, Annika Sehl, David A. L. Levy
{"title":"Analysis of the Relation Between and Impact of Public Service Media and Private Media","authors":"R. Nielsen, R. Fletcher, Annika Sehl, David A. L. Levy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2868065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report is based on examination of more than a thousand academic and stakeholder studies on the relation between and impact of public service media and private media. It presents a closer review focusing on the most relevant 36 academic publications and 16 industry publications. We find that —1) There is a significant amount of research that assess the political impact of public service media. We review 23 academic studies and 4 stakeholder studies. The evidence-based consensus in this area is based on a growing number of studies by different researchers using different kinds of data and approaches, with the majority concluding that public service media have a net positive impact on (a) the amount of hard news produced and (b) levels of political knowledge, and, by extension, they may also (c) incrementally increase political participation. It is important to note that this research often also find the same positive impact for some forms of private sector media, most notably morning newspapers and that research still suggests that especially newspapers produce the largest proportion of news output in most countries. 2) There is less research on the social impact of public service media. We discuss 11 academic studies and 5 stakeholder studies that examine public service media impact on social trust, broader knowledge about society (beyond politics), and the degree to which media content reflects the diversity of society itself. The studies reviewed tend to point towards a net positive impact of public service media when it comes to trust, knowledge, and diversity. But the limited number of studies means that there is little or no replication and hence no basis for identifying an evidence-based consensus on the social impact of public service media. American research has suggested that private sector media can help increase social cohesion, but other researchers argue that media undermine social capital. There is no evidence-based consensus in this area. 3) There is little research that assesses the market impact of public service media. There are very few academic publications on this subject, and most of them are of limited relevance when it comes to assessing the likely market impact of public media in the contemporary media environment. The most robust research studies carried out in this area are funded by stakeholders, including government agencies, public service media organisations, and private sector media organisations (and in the latter two cases findings tend to support the funders’ political priorities). We review 2 academic studies and 7 stakeholder studies. On the whole, existing studies provide little evidence for a negative market impact of public service media upon domestic private sector media. But the limited number of studies and the dearth of independent research means there is no clear evidence - based consensus. The academic and stakeholder research reviewed thus provide s strong evidence that public service media have a positive political impact, some evidence that public service media have a positive social impact, and little evidence that public service media have a negative market impact.","PeriodicalId":359567,"journal":{"name":"RCRN: Rhetoric & the Media (Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RCRN: Rhetoric & the Media (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2868065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

This report is based on examination of more than a thousand academic and stakeholder studies on the relation between and impact of public service media and private media. It presents a closer review focusing on the most relevant 36 academic publications and 16 industry publications. We find that —1) There is a significant amount of research that assess the political impact of public service media. We review 23 academic studies and 4 stakeholder studies. The evidence-based consensus in this area is based on a growing number of studies by different researchers using different kinds of data and approaches, with the majority concluding that public service media have a net positive impact on (a) the amount of hard news produced and (b) levels of political knowledge, and, by extension, they may also (c) incrementally increase political participation. It is important to note that this research often also find the same positive impact for some forms of private sector media, most notably morning newspapers and that research still suggests that especially newspapers produce the largest proportion of news output in most countries. 2) There is less research on the social impact of public service media. We discuss 11 academic studies and 5 stakeholder studies that examine public service media impact on social trust, broader knowledge about society (beyond politics), and the degree to which media content reflects the diversity of society itself. The studies reviewed tend to point towards a net positive impact of public service media when it comes to trust, knowledge, and diversity. But the limited number of studies means that there is little or no replication and hence no basis for identifying an evidence-based consensus on the social impact of public service media. American research has suggested that private sector media can help increase social cohesion, but other researchers argue that media undermine social capital. There is no evidence-based consensus in this area. 3) There is little research that assesses the market impact of public service media. There are very few academic publications on this subject, and most of them are of limited relevance when it comes to assessing the likely market impact of public media in the contemporary media environment. The most robust research studies carried out in this area are funded by stakeholders, including government agencies, public service media organisations, and private sector media organisations (and in the latter two cases findings tend to support the funders’ political priorities). We review 2 academic studies and 7 stakeholder studies. On the whole, existing studies provide little evidence for a negative market impact of public service media upon domestic private sector media. But the limited number of studies and the dearth of independent research means there is no clear evidence - based consensus. The academic and stakeholder research reviewed thus provide s strong evidence that public service media have a positive political impact, some evidence that public service media have a positive social impact, and little evidence that public service media have a negative market impact.
公共服务媒体与民营媒体的关系与影响分析
这份报告是基于上千份关于公共服务媒体和私营媒体之间的关系和影响的学术和利益相关者研究。它对最相关的36种学术出版物和16种行业出版物进行了更仔细的审查。我们发现-1)有大量的研究评估了公共服务媒体的政治影响。我们回顾了23项学术研究和4项利益相关者研究。这一领域的基于证据的共识是基于不同研究人员使用不同类型的数据和方法进行的越来越多的研究,其中大多数结论认为,公共服务媒体对(a)硬新闻产出的数量和(b)政治知识水平具有净积极影响,并由此延伸,它们还可能(c)逐步增加政治参与。值得注意的是,这项研究往往也发现对某些形式的私营部门媒体,特别是晨报产生了同样的积极影响,研究仍然表明,特别是报纸在大多数国家的新闻产出中所占比例最大。2)公共服务媒体的社会影响研究较少。我们讨论了11项学术研究和5项利益相关者研究,这些研究考察了公共服务媒体对社会信任、更广泛的社会知识(超越政治)以及媒体内容反映社会本身多样性的程度的影响。所审查的研究往往指向公共服务媒体在信任、知识和多样性方面的净积极影响。但是,研究数量有限意味着很少或根本没有复制,因此没有基础来确定关于公共服务媒体的社会影响的循证共识。美国的研究表明,私营媒体可以帮助增加社会凝聚力,但其他研究人员认为,媒体破坏社会资本。在这个领域没有基于证据的共识。3)对公共服务媒体的市场影响进行评估的研究较少。关于这一主题的学术出版物非常少,其中大多数在评估公共媒体在当代媒体环境中可能产生的市场影响方面具有有限的相关性。在这一领域开展的最有力的研究是由利益相关者资助的,包括政府机构、公共服务媒体组织和私营部门媒体组织(在后两种情况下,研究结果往往支持资助者的政治优先事项)。我们回顾了2项学术研究和7项利益相关者研究。总体而言,现有研究几乎没有证据表明公共服务媒体对国内私营部门媒体产生负面的市场影响。但是有限的研究数量和独立研究的缺乏意味着没有明确的基于证据的共识。因此,学术界和利益相关者的研究提供了强有力的证据表明公共服务媒体具有积极的政治影响,一些证据表明公共服务媒体具有积极的社会影响,而很少证据表明公共服务媒体具有消极的市场影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信