{"title":"Društvene predodžbe, slojevi vremena i anticipacija u tri poznata umjetnička djela","authors":"Vjeran Katunarić","doi":"10.22210/ur.2020.064.1_2/01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS, TEMPORAL LAYERS AND ANTICIPATION IN THREE FAMOUS WORKS OF ART\n\nThe paper starts with the conceptual/theoretical approaches to social representations, structures of time, and vision of the future (anticipation) in three works of\nart. Don Quixote by Miguel Cervantes is a model example for illustrating the stated\napproaches. The concept of social representations (Durkheim, Moscovici, Abric)\ncan be illustrated by the protagonist in Cervantes’ novel. Cervantes’ implicit vision of the future, except a turnover at the end of the novel, is closer to Sancho’s\nrealism and pessimism than Don Quixote’s idealism and optimism. Such a shift\nin the central field of social awareness has a double impact on the way of understanding social reality. First, complementarity between the central (visionary) and\nthe peripheral area (of everyday experience) of social consciousness is reduced,\nand contradiction is enhanced. Second, this contradiction exacerbates reversal in\nthe relation between the sublime and banal for the sake of the unfettered market.\nThe conclusive remarks offer a new research field concerning the impact of the\nsubsequent epoch of the Enlightenment on the levelling of the values in the name\nof both the scientific disenchantments of the world and the expansion of the centrifugal forces of the marketplace. The concept of anticipation is further discussed\nwith two works of art from the Renaissance: Jan van Eyck’s “Portrait of Arnolfini”\nand Leonardo da Vinci’s “The Last Supper”. Both works anticipate the coming of capitalism. The first painting points out the function of marriage as the institution\nof inheritance and accumulation of private property, as a part of the new alliance of\npower between the new middle class and the old upper (feudal) class. In the second\npainting, Jesus’ announcement of his death results in the emptying of the moral\ncentre-stage of Christianity. This moment opens the space for the penetration and\neventual hegemony of capitalism in society. The morality of the Church is rather\nprovisory and fluctuates between two contrasts: One is the illusion of the return of\nJesus, and the other is the rise of the new secular power, the totalitarian capitalism,\nwhich does not permit any alternative, as if wanting to replace the “only one God”.","PeriodicalId":371506,"journal":{"name":"Umjetnost riječi: časopis za znanost o književnosti, izvedbenoj umjetnosti i filmu","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Umjetnost riječi: časopis za znanost o književnosti, izvedbenoj umjetnosti i filmu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22210/ur.2020.064.1_2/01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS, TEMPORAL LAYERS AND ANTICIPATION IN THREE FAMOUS WORKS OF ART
The paper starts with the conceptual/theoretical approaches to social representations, structures of time, and vision of the future (anticipation) in three works of
art. Don Quixote by Miguel Cervantes is a model example for illustrating the stated
approaches. The concept of social representations (Durkheim, Moscovici, Abric)
can be illustrated by the protagonist in Cervantes’ novel. Cervantes’ implicit vision of the future, except a turnover at the end of the novel, is closer to Sancho’s
realism and pessimism than Don Quixote’s idealism and optimism. Such a shift
in the central field of social awareness has a double impact on the way of understanding social reality. First, complementarity between the central (visionary) and
the peripheral area (of everyday experience) of social consciousness is reduced,
and contradiction is enhanced. Second, this contradiction exacerbates reversal in
the relation between the sublime and banal for the sake of the unfettered market.
The conclusive remarks offer a new research field concerning the impact of the
subsequent epoch of the Enlightenment on the levelling of the values in the name
of both the scientific disenchantments of the world and the expansion of the centrifugal forces of the marketplace. The concept of anticipation is further discussed
with two works of art from the Renaissance: Jan van Eyck’s “Portrait of Arnolfini”
and Leonardo da Vinci’s “The Last Supper”. Both works anticipate the coming of capitalism. The first painting points out the function of marriage as the institution
of inheritance and accumulation of private property, as a part of the new alliance of
power between the new middle class and the old upper (feudal) class. In the second
painting, Jesus’ announcement of his death results in the emptying of the moral
centre-stage of Christianity. This moment opens the space for the penetration and
eventual hegemony of capitalism in society. The morality of the Church is rather
provisory and fluctuates between two contrasts: One is the illusion of the return of
Jesus, and the other is the rise of the new secular power, the totalitarian capitalism,
which does not permit any alternative, as if wanting to replace the “only one God”.