{"title":"Sabine Hossenfelder and the crisis of modern physics","authors":"A. Kandić","doi":"10.2298/theo2302195k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The book of one of the currently most famous female physicists, Sabine\n Hossenfelder, Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray, is a reason for\n discussing the crisis in which modern physics has fallen, as well as new\n tendencies in physics as possible ways to overcome the situation. Part of\n the responsibility for decades of stagnation in the development of physics\n is borne by certain aspects of the heritage of ancient, specifically\n Pythagorean-Platonic philosophy, which have found their place in modern\n science. The critical insights presented by Hossenfelder are very well\n founded. However, the author can be criticized for overlooking some ways of\n thought in physics that represent a strong alternative to aesthetic\n theoretical approaches, mostly inspired by ancient Greek natural philosophy.\n For example, physicist Fritjof Capra?s book The Tao of Physics points to\n numerous parallels between Eastern systems of thought and 20th century\n physics.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoria, Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2302195k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The book of one of the currently most famous female physicists, Sabine
Hossenfelder, Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray, is a reason for
discussing the crisis in which modern physics has fallen, as well as new
tendencies in physics as possible ways to overcome the situation. Part of
the responsibility for decades of stagnation in the development of physics
is borne by certain aspects of the heritage of ancient, specifically
Pythagorean-Platonic philosophy, which have found their place in modern
science. The critical insights presented by Hossenfelder are very well
founded. However, the author can be criticized for overlooking some ways of
thought in physics that represent a strong alternative to aesthetic
theoretical approaches, mostly inspired by ancient Greek natural philosophy.
For example, physicist Fritjof Capra?s book The Tao of Physics points to
numerous parallels between Eastern systems of thought and 20th century
physics.