Knowledge as a Problem

S. Goldman
{"title":"Knowledge as a Problem","authors":"S. Goldman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197518625.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From its pre-Socratic beginnings, Western philosophy has been riven by a battle over the natures of knowledge and Being. On one side were Parmenides, Plato, Aristotle, and their intellectual descendants, the rationalist philosophers; on the other, the sophists, among them Protagoras, Gorgias, Antiphon and their intellectual descendants, the skeptical philosophers. For the former, knowledge is essentially different from opinion and belief because it is universal, necessary, and certain, revealing truths about a reality external to and independent of the mind. For the latter, knowledge is opinions and beliefs for which supporting reasons drawn from experience can be given and has ever-changing experience as its object, not an unchanging reality beyond experience. Modern science internalized both sides of this battle.","PeriodicalId":114432,"journal":{"name":"Science Wars","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Wars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197518625.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From its pre-Socratic beginnings, Western philosophy has been riven by a battle over the natures of knowledge and Being. On one side were Parmenides, Plato, Aristotle, and their intellectual descendants, the rationalist philosophers; on the other, the sophists, among them Protagoras, Gorgias, Antiphon and their intellectual descendants, the skeptical philosophers. For the former, knowledge is essentially different from opinion and belief because it is universal, necessary, and certain, revealing truths about a reality external to and independent of the mind. For the latter, knowledge is opinions and beliefs for which supporting reasons drawn from experience can be given and has ever-changing experience as its object, not an unchanging reality beyond experience. Modern science internalized both sides of this battle.
知识是个问题
从前苏格拉底时代开始,西方哲学就被知识和存在的本质之争所撕裂。一边是巴门尼德、柏拉图、亚里士多德和他们的知识分子后代,即理性主义哲学家;另一方面是诡辩家,其中包括普罗泰戈拉,戈尔吉亚,安提丰和他们的后代,怀疑论哲学家。对于前者来说,知识在本质上不同于意见和信仰,因为知识是普遍的、必然的和确定的,它揭示了一个外在的、独立于心灵的现实的真理。对于后者来说,知识是一种观点和信念,它可以从经验中得出支持理由,并以不断变化的经验为对象,而不是超越经验的不变的现实。现代科学内化了这场战争的双方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信