Between Pressure and Flexibility: Provider Scheduling in the Sharing Economy

G. Newlands, C. Lutz, Christian Fieseler
{"title":"Between Pressure and Flexibility: Provider Scheduling in the Sharing Economy","authors":"G. Newlands, C. Lutz, Christian Fieseler","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3241689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sharing economy offers individuals various opportunities to generate additional income through sharing their personal possessions with strangers. The flexibility promised by sharing platforms, to share when and how often individuals prefer, has been highlighted as the key advantage of the sharing economy model. However, for sharing platforms which rely on ongoing and reliable sharing among private individuals, a tension can be observed between platforms encouraging and discouraging this flexibility. Simultaneously, the ostensible flexibility and informality of the sharing economy must in-creasingly reconcile itself with the reality of over-work and full-time engagement, whereby individuals may face pressure to provide a mixture of platform and individual factors. In this contribution, we conduct an initial exploration into this tension between flexibility and pressure in the sharing econo-my. Using data across twelve European countries, we differentiate perceptions of flexibility and con-trol among those who share their assets. The findings indicate that perceived pressure to provide var-ies by country, sharing frequency, motivation, most frequently used platform, and is based on whether individuals depend on the income from sharing. Perceived schedule control varies by age, education, country, and motivation. Taken together, the results show a picture where those most involved and dependent on sharing their assets feel the most pressured, while young, lesser educated providers also have least perceived schedule control. Thus, our study presents providing in the sharing economy as a more hierarchical activity than one might assume based on media and platform narratives.","PeriodicalId":268355,"journal":{"name":"PROD: Empirical (Service) (Topic)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROD: Empirical (Service) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3241689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The sharing economy offers individuals various opportunities to generate additional income through sharing their personal possessions with strangers. The flexibility promised by sharing platforms, to share when and how often individuals prefer, has been highlighted as the key advantage of the sharing economy model. However, for sharing platforms which rely on ongoing and reliable sharing among private individuals, a tension can be observed between platforms encouraging and discouraging this flexibility. Simultaneously, the ostensible flexibility and informality of the sharing economy must in-creasingly reconcile itself with the reality of over-work and full-time engagement, whereby individuals may face pressure to provide a mixture of platform and individual factors. In this contribution, we conduct an initial exploration into this tension between flexibility and pressure in the sharing econo-my. Using data across twelve European countries, we differentiate perceptions of flexibility and con-trol among those who share their assets. The findings indicate that perceived pressure to provide var-ies by country, sharing frequency, motivation, most frequently used platform, and is based on whether individuals depend on the income from sharing. Perceived schedule control varies by age, education, country, and motivation. Taken together, the results show a picture where those most involved and dependent on sharing their assets feel the most pressured, while young, lesser educated providers also have least perceived schedule control. Thus, our study presents providing in the sharing economy as a more hierarchical activity than one might assume based on media and platform narratives.
压力与灵活性之间:共享经济中的供应商调度
共享经济为个人提供了各种机会,通过与陌生人分享个人财产来获得额外收入。共享平台承诺的灵活性,即个人喜欢的分享时间和频率,已被强调为共享经济模式的关键优势。然而,对于依赖于私人之间持续可靠的共享的共享平台,可以观察到平台之间鼓励和阻碍这种灵活性的紧张关系。同时,共享经济表面上的灵活性和非正式性必须越来越多地与过度工作和全职投入的现实相协调,在这种现实中,个人可能面临提供平台和个人因素混合的压力。在这篇文章中,我们对共享经济中灵活性和压力之间的紧张关系进行了初步探讨。利用12个欧洲国家的数据,我们区分了那些共享资产的人对灵活性和控制权的看法。研究结果表明,提供的感知压力因国家、分享频率、动机、最常用的平台而异,并基于个人是否依赖分享收入。对时间安排的控制因年龄、教育程度、国家和动机而异。综上所述,结果显示,那些最参与和依赖分享资产的人感到压力最大,而年轻的、受教育程度较低的提供者也感觉不到时间控制。因此,我们的研究表明,在共享经济中,提供服务是一种比基于媒体和平台叙事的假设更分层的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信