A Comparison of Dictionary Building Methods for Sentiment Analysis in Software Engineering Text

M. R. Islam, M. Zibran
{"title":"A Comparison of Dictionary Building Methods for Sentiment Analysis in Software Engineering Text","authors":"M. R. Islam, M. Zibran","doi":"10.1109/ESEM.2017.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sentiment Analysis (SA) in Software Engineering (SE) texts suffers from low accuracies primarily due to the lack of an effective dictionary. The use of a domain-specific dictionary can improve the accuracy of SA in a particular domain. Building a domain dictionary is not a trivial task. The performance of lexical SA also varies based on the method applied to develop the dictionary. This paper includes a quantitative comparison of four dictionaries representing distinct dictionary building methods to identify which methods have higher/lower potential to perform well in constructing a domain dictionary for SA in SE texts.","PeriodicalId":213866,"journal":{"name":"2017 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)","volume":"213 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2017.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Sentiment Analysis (SA) in Software Engineering (SE) texts suffers from low accuracies primarily due to the lack of an effective dictionary. The use of a domain-specific dictionary can improve the accuracy of SA in a particular domain. Building a domain dictionary is not a trivial task. The performance of lexical SA also varies based on the method applied to develop the dictionary. This paper includes a quantitative comparison of four dictionaries representing distinct dictionary building methods to identify which methods have higher/lower potential to perform well in constructing a domain dictionary for SA in SE texts.
软件工程文本情感分析的词典构建方法比较
软件工程(SE)文本中的情感分析(SA)由于缺乏有效的词典而导致准确率低。使用特定于领域的字典可以提高特定领域中SA的准确性。构建域字典不是一项简单的任务。词法情景分析的性能也因开发词典的方法而异。本文对代表不同词典构建方法的四种词典进行了定量比较,以确定哪些方法在构建SE文本中的SA领域词典方面具有更高/更低的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信