{"title":"Private and Public Devotion in Late Renaissance Italy: The Role of Church Censorship","authors":"Giorgio Caravale","doi":"10.1163/9789004375871_018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the differences in their respective traditions, from the thirteenth century onwards, Franciscan and then Dominican spirituality placed the notion of inward prayer at the heart of their religious discourses. Following St Francis, both St Clare and St Anthony located ‘the foundation of contemplative life in the spirit of prayer’, while St Bonaventure noted that ‘perfect prayer’ was a fundamental stage in the mystical ascent towards God.1 In the fourteenth century, the Dominicans – especially Domenico Cavalca – developed Thomas Aquinas’ concept of the spirit, understanding mental prayer as the essence of the contemplative practice of mystical asceticism. Later, Catherine of Siena pronounced that humble, continuous, faithful and disinterested prayer was the instrument through which the soul acquires all virtue’,2 asserting the superiority of mental prayer over spoken prayer. The rich medieval tradition of mental prayer survived throughout the fifteenth century in the thought of great spiritual authorities, such as St Antonino and Ludovico Barbo, until the turn of the sixteenth century when it found its most efficacious expression in the thought of Savonarola.3 Savonarola’s defence of mental prayer not only acknowledges the superiority of mental prayer over spoken prayer, but explicitly criticises devotion that is outwardly expressed.4 According to Savonarola, and many other critics of the Roman Curia, public devotion encouraged mechanical recitation over profound spiritual reflection. Spoken prayer, and public ceremonies more generally, should instead recover their original functions as stimuli and","PeriodicalId":144231,"journal":{"name":"Domestic Devotions in Early Modern Italy","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Domestic Devotions in Early Modern Italy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004375871_018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite the differences in their respective traditions, from the thirteenth century onwards, Franciscan and then Dominican spirituality placed the notion of inward prayer at the heart of their religious discourses. Following St Francis, both St Clare and St Anthony located ‘the foundation of contemplative life in the spirit of prayer’, while St Bonaventure noted that ‘perfect prayer’ was a fundamental stage in the mystical ascent towards God.1 In the fourteenth century, the Dominicans – especially Domenico Cavalca – developed Thomas Aquinas’ concept of the spirit, understanding mental prayer as the essence of the contemplative practice of mystical asceticism. Later, Catherine of Siena pronounced that humble, continuous, faithful and disinterested prayer was the instrument through which the soul acquires all virtue’,2 asserting the superiority of mental prayer over spoken prayer. The rich medieval tradition of mental prayer survived throughout the fifteenth century in the thought of great spiritual authorities, such as St Antonino and Ludovico Barbo, until the turn of the sixteenth century when it found its most efficacious expression in the thought of Savonarola.3 Savonarola’s defence of mental prayer not only acknowledges the superiority of mental prayer over spoken prayer, but explicitly criticises devotion that is outwardly expressed.4 According to Savonarola, and many other critics of the Roman Curia, public devotion encouraged mechanical recitation over profound spiritual reflection. Spoken prayer, and public ceremonies more generally, should instead recover their original functions as stimuli and
尽管他们各自的传统存在差异,但从13世纪开始,方济各会和随后的多明尼加灵性将向内祈祷的概念置于其宗教话语的核心。继圣方济各之后,圣克莱尔和圣安东尼都将“祈祷精神作为沉思生活的基础”,而圣博纳文蒂尔则指出,“完美的祈祷”是通往上帝的神秘上升的一个基本阶段。1在14世纪,多米尼加人——尤其是多梅尼科·卡瓦尔卡——发展了托马斯·阿奎那的精神概念,将精神祈祷理解为神秘禁欲主义沉思实践的本质。后来,锡耶纳的凯瑟琳(Catherine of Siena)宣称,谦卑、持续、忠诚和无私的祈祷是灵魂获得所有美德的工具,2主张精神祈祷比口头祈祷更优越。丰富的中世纪精神祈祷传统在圣安东尼奥和卢多维科·巴尔博等伟大的精神权威的思想中幸存了整个15世纪,直到16世纪之交,它在萨沃纳罗拉的思想中得到了最有效的表达。萨沃纳罗拉对精神祈祷的辩护不仅承认精神祈祷比口头祈祷优越,而且明确地批评了外在表达的奉献根据萨沃纳罗拉和许多其他罗马教廷的批评者的说法,公共奉献鼓励机械的背诵,而不是深刻的精神反思。口头祈祷,以及更普遍的公共仪式,应该恢复其作为刺激和鼓励的原始功能