IDEAL CONSTRUCTION OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITY REGULATION AS AN ORGAN OF A LIMITED COMPANY BASED ON JUSTICE VALUE

Husin, Anis Mashdurohatun., Mahmutarom HR
{"title":"IDEAL CONSTRUCTION OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITY REGULATION AS AN ORGAN OF A LIMITED COMPANY BASED ON JUSTICE VALUE","authors":"Husin, Anis Mashdurohatun., Mahmutarom HR","doi":"10.38193/ijrcms.2023.5209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The responsibility of the directors as a limited liability company organ of justice is related to legal protection of third parties in the event that the directors commit ultra vires actions which can give rise to the rights of the aggrieved party to act or demand compensation, including recovery efforts aiming to restore the rights of the aggrieved party, but this is not strictly regulated if the action This also provides benefits to the company, and settlement if the directors who are burdened with personal responsibility do not have sufficient wealth to restore the rights of the aggrieved party. This study aims to analyze and find the ideal construction of the regulation of the responsibilities of directors as an organ of a limited liability company based on the value of justice. The Constructivism Paradigm, the approach method in research is social legal research. The data used are secondary data and primary data. The results of the study found that the reconstruction of the regulation of the responsibilities of directors as an organ of a limited liability company is based on the value of justice, in this case Article 97 paragraph (3) of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, namely that each member of the board of directors is fully personally responsible for the company's losses. if the person concerned is guilty or negligent in carrying out his duties in accordance with the provisions referred to in paragraph (2). If the company also benefits in the event that the directors are guilty or negligent in carrying out their duties, then the members of the board of directors and the company are responsible for the loss, and in the event that the directors who are burdened with personal responsibility are unable to be held responsible for example for reasons of not having sufficient wealth, then the company first bailout the losses of third parties and then the directors are obliged to account for it to the company.","PeriodicalId":145800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38193/ijrcms.2023.5209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The responsibility of the directors as a limited liability company organ of justice is related to legal protection of third parties in the event that the directors commit ultra vires actions which can give rise to the rights of the aggrieved party to act or demand compensation, including recovery efforts aiming to restore the rights of the aggrieved party, but this is not strictly regulated if the action This also provides benefits to the company, and settlement if the directors who are burdened with personal responsibility do not have sufficient wealth to restore the rights of the aggrieved party. This study aims to analyze and find the ideal construction of the regulation of the responsibilities of directors as an organ of a limited liability company based on the value of justice. The Constructivism Paradigm, the approach method in research is social legal research. The data used are secondary data and primary data. The results of the study found that the reconstruction of the regulation of the responsibilities of directors as an organ of a limited liability company is based on the value of justice, in this case Article 97 paragraph (3) of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, namely that each member of the board of directors is fully personally responsible for the company's losses. if the person concerned is guilty or negligent in carrying out his duties in accordance with the provisions referred to in paragraph (2). If the company also benefits in the event that the directors are guilty or negligent in carrying out their duties, then the members of the board of directors and the company are responsible for the loss, and in the event that the directors who are burdened with personal responsibility are unable to be held responsible for example for reasons of not having sufficient wealth, then the company first bailout the losses of third parties and then the directors are obliged to account for it to the company.
基于正义价值的有限责任公司董事责任监管的理想构建
作为有限责任公司的司法机关,董事的责任涉及在董事采取越权行为的情况下对第三方的法律保护,这些越权行为可能导致受害方采取行动或要求赔偿的权利,包括旨在恢复受害方权利的恢复努力,但如果该行为也为公司带来了利益,则没有严格监管。如果承担个人责任的董事没有足够的财富来恢复受害方的权利,则进行和解。本研究旨在分析和寻找基于正义价值的有限责任公司董事作为机构职责监管的理想构建。建构主义范式,研究中的途径方法是社会法学研究。使用的数据有辅助数据和主要数据。研究结果发现,董事作为有限责任公司的一个机构的责任监管的重构是基于正义的价值,在这种情况下,2007年关于有限责任公司的第40号法律第97条第(3)款,即董事会的每个成员对公司的损失承担全部个人责任。依照第(2)款规定,有关人员在履行职责时犯了罪或者玩忽职守。如果董事在履行职责时犯了罪或者玩忽职守,公司也受益,则董事会成员和公司应对损失负责;如果承担个人责任的董事因为没有足够的财富而无法承担责任,那么公司首先要救助第三方的损失然后董事有义务对公司负责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信