Beyond �I Know it When I See it�: WEC and the Process of Unearthing Faculty Expertise

Stacey Sheriff
{"title":"Beyond �I Know it When I See it�: WEC and the Process of Unearthing Faculty Expertise","authors":"Stacey Sheriff","doi":"10.37514/per-b.2021.1299.2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers a paradox at the heart of WEC and, arguably, all WAC work: the disciplinary immersion that leads to expertise makes it difficult for faculty members to articulate and pass on their knowledge of writing in the disciplines. Drawing on research in WAC/WID, psychology, and education, the chapter offers tools for WEC facilitators. First, it outlines three socio-cognitive frameworks that can help faculty become aware of their blind spots and tacit expectations. Second, it offers a heuristic to describe faculty members’ key realizations about writing in their disciplines as they work to unearth disciplinary expertise. Finally, a case study from a computer science department in a small liberal arts college illustrates the application of these tools in the context of the WEC process. Implementing a WEC initiative increases faculty members’ awareness of and attention to their own expertise, expectations, and potential blind spots as they articulate the characteristics, values, conventions, and forms of writing and research in their majors.","PeriodicalId":200684,"journal":{"name":"Writing-Enriched Curricula: Models of Faculty-Driven and Departmental Transformation","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing-Enriched Curricula: Models of Faculty-Driven and Departmental Transformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/per-b.2021.1299.2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This chapter considers a paradox at the heart of WEC and, arguably, all WAC work: the disciplinary immersion that leads to expertise makes it difficult for faculty members to articulate and pass on their knowledge of writing in the disciplines. Drawing on research in WAC/WID, psychology, and education, the chapter offers tools for WEC facilitators. First, it outlines three socio-cognitive frameworks that can help faculty become aware of their blind spots and tacit expectations. Second, it offers a heuristic to describe faculty members’ key realizations about writing in their disciplines as they work to unearth disciplinary expertise. Finally, a case study from a computer science department in a small liberal arts college illustrates the application of these tools in the context of the WEC process. Implementing a WEC initiative increases faculty members’ awareness of and attention to their own expertise, expectations, and potential blind spots as they articulate the characteristics, values, conventions, and forms of writing and research in their majors.
超越“当我看到它时我就知道”:WEC和发掘教师专业知识的过程
本章考虑了WEC核心的一个悖论,可以说,所有WAC工作都是如此:学科沉浸导致专业知识,这使得教师很难表达和传递他们在学科中的写作知识。根据WAC/WID、心理学和教育方面的研究,本章为WEC促进者提供了工具。首先,它概述了三个社会认知框架,可以帮助教师意识到他们的盲点和隐性期望。其次,它提供了一个启发式来描述教师在挖掘学科专业知识时对其学科写作的关键认识。最后,一个来自小型文理学院计算机科学系的案例研究说明了这些工具在WEC过程中的应用。实施WEC倡议可以提高教师对自己专业知识、期望和潜在盲点的认识和关注,因为他们可以阐明自己专业的特点、价值观、惯例和写作和研究的形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信