The Violence of Voicelessness: The Impact of Felony Disenfranchisement on Recidivism

G. Hamilton-Smith, M. Vogel
{"title":"The Violence of Voicelessness: The Impact of Felony Disenfranchisement on Recidivism","authors":"G. Hamilton-Smith, M. Vogel","doi":"10.15779/Z38Z66F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2010, nearly 5.3 million American citizens were unable to vote because 2 ,3 of a collateral consequence ftrom a felony conviction known as disenfranchisement. The political disenfranchisement of ex-felons is not accomplished through applying a provision within the United States Constitution or of any federal statute, but is instead administered at the discretion of state legislatures. In light of this state-bystate approach, there is considerable variation in how disenfranchisement is imposed throughout the country. The severity of disenfranchisement runs the gamut from allowing incarcerated prisoners to vote (Maine and Vermont) to prohibiting voting rights to those who complete their sentences.6 Even though disenfranchisement is a consequence of a felony conviction, courts have generally considered it to be","PeriodicalId":408518,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38Z66F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In 2010, nearly 5.3 million American citizens were unable to vote because 2 ,3 of a collateral consequence ftrom a felony conviction known as disenfranchisement. The political disenfranchisement of ex-felons is not accomplished through applying a provision within the United States Constitution or of any federal statute, but is instead administered at the discretion of state legislatures. In light of this state-bystate approach, there is considerable variation in how disenfranchisement is imposed throughout the country. The severity of disenfranchisement runs the gamut from allowing incarcerated prisoners to vote (Maine and Vermont) to prohibiting voting rights to those who complete their sentences.6 Even though disenfranchisement is a consequence of a felony conviction, courts have generally considered it to be
无声的暴力:剥夺重罪公民权对再犯的影响
2010年,近530万美国公民无法投票,原因是被判重罪的附带后果,即被剥夺公民权。剥夺前重罪犯的政治权利不是通过适用美国宪法或任何联邦法规的规定来实现的,而是由州立法机关酌情处理。鉴于各州的做法,在全国范围内,剥夺公民权的方式存在很大差异。剥夺公民权的严重程度从允许被监禁的囚犯投票(缅因州和佛蒙特州)到禁止那些刑满释放的人投票尽管剥夺公民权是重罪定罪的结果,但法院通常认为是这样
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信