Suing Texas State Senate Bill 8 Plaintiffs under Federal Law for Violations of Constitutional Rights

Anthony J. Colangelo
{"title":"Suing Texas State Senate Bill 8 Plaintiffs under Federal Law for Violations of Constitutional Rights","authors":"Anthony J. Colangelo","doi":"10.25172/slrf.74.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many people are deriding (or celebrating) the exceptional—and exceptionally deceptive—device of the Texas legislature to so-called “deputize” private individuals as government enforcement agents to carry out a state anti-abortion law that, at present, violates the U.S. Constitution. The law at issue, commonly referred to as Senate Bill 8, is extraordinarily broad, and provides that anyone can sue anyone who “aids or abets” an abortion after about six weeks of pregnancy (including, if read literally, the Uber driver who drove the woman to the clinic). The law awards recovery of no less than $10,000 and makes no exceptions for pregnancies resulting from incest or rape. Actually, the deceptive nature of the law can be subdivided into three devices. I’ll address each in turn with the principal aim of suing someone under federal law for bringing suit under the Texas state law. In this respect, I’ll be going quite a bit further than those who seek simply to spotlight the unconstitutionality of the Texas law. Rather, I’m going after the plaintiff who sues under it.","PeriodicalId":114156,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Federalism & Sub-National Politics eJournal","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Institutions: Federalism & Sub-National Politics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25172/slrf.74.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many people are deriding (or celebrating) the exceptional—and exceptionally deceptive—device of the Texas legislature to so-called “deputize” private individuals as government enforcement agents to carry out a state anti-abortion law that, at present, violates the U.S. Constitution. The law at issue, commonly referred to as Senate Bill 8, is extraordinarily broad, and provides that anyone can sue anyone who “aids or abets” an abortion after about six weeks of pregnancy (including, if read literally, the Uber driver who drove the woman to the clinic). The law awards recovery of no less than $10,000 and makes no exceptions for pregnancies resulting from incest or rape. Actually, the deceptive nature of the law can be subdivided into three devices. I’ll address each in turn with the principal aim of suing someone under federal law for bringing suit under the Texas state law. In this respect, I’ll be going quite a bit further than those who seek simply to spotlight the unconstitutionality of the Texas law. Rather, I’m going after the plaintiff who sues under it.
根据联邦法律起诉德克萨斯州参议院法案8名原告侵犯宪法权利
许多人都在嘲笑(或庆祝)德克萨斯州立法机构的这种特殊的——也是非常欺骗性的——手段,即所谓的“代理”个人作为政府执法机构来执行目前违反美国宪法的州反堕胎法。争议中的法律通常被称为参议院第8号法案(Senate Bill 8),内容非常广泛,规定任何人都可以起诉任何在怀孕约六周后“帮助或教唆”堕胎的人(如果从字面上看,也包括开车送孕妇去诊所的优步司机)。法律规定赔偿不少于1万美元,对乱伦或强奸造成的怀孕也不例外。实际上,法律的欺骗性可以细分为三种手段。我将依次讨论每个问题,主要目的是根据联邦法律起诉根据德克萨斯州法律提起诉讼的人。在这方面,我将比那些只想强调德克萨斯州法律违宪的人走得更远。相反,我要追究原告的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信