Deer impact on Turkey oak and chestnut coppice production in Tuscany. Experimental survey and a methodological approach

S. Fiorentini, D. Travaglini, S. Nocentini
{"title":"Deer impact on Turkey oak and chestnut coppice production in Tuscany. Experimental survey and a methodological approach","authors":"S. Fiorentini, D. Travaglini, S. Nocentini","doi":"10.4129/ifm.2015.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to define a quick method for estimating the loss of wood production at rotation age caused by red deer and roe deer in chestnut coppices and in Turkey oak coppices. Three study areas were chosen for the study, with presence of different or overlapping red deer and roe deer populations. A total of 224 plots were selected in coppiced areas 2 and 5 years after felling. General yield tables were used for estimating coppice growth with and without browsing. Results showed a sensible difference between areas with red deer and areas with only roe deer. Chestnut coppices showed a better reaction to deer browsing compared to Turkey oak coppices. In Turkey oak coppices impacted by red deer browsing after felling, we estimated a sensible loss of production at traditional rotation age (18 years), and an average of 8 years was needed to attain the same level of production as in non-impacted coppices. With only roe deer, an average of 2 years were needed after rotation age to reach expected production. In chestnut coppices, at traditional rotation age (8 years) a loss of wood production was estimated in less than half of all the examined coppices. In these cases 2 more years were estimated to reach the expected production at rotation age. With red deer bark stripping was frequently recorded on both young and older shoots in chestnut coppices. We concluded that in areas with an overabundance of deer such as the one we examined here, there is the need for a change not only in deer management but also in forest management. A shared management strategy of both coppices and deer populations at the different space and time scales is necessary otherwise coppicing will continue to be a factor of strong attraction for deer impact, with serious risks for the conservation of coppice regeneration and productivity. The quick assessment method here presented can be a useful tool for supporting discussion and shared decisions among the different stakeholders involved in natural resource planning and management.","PeriodicalId":173092,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Forest and Mountain Environments","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Forest and Mountain Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4129/ifm.2015.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to define a quick method for estimating the loss of wood production at rotation age caused by red deer and roe deer in chestnut coppices and in Turkey oak coppices. Three study areas were chosen for the study, with presence of different or overlapping red deer and roe deer populations. A total of 224 plots were selected in coppiced areas 2 and 5 years after felling. General yield tables were used for estimating coppice growth with and without browsing. Results showed a sensible difference between areas with red deer and areas with only roe deer. Chestnut coppices showed a better reaction to deer browsing compared to Turkey oak coppices. In Turkey oak coppices impacted by red deer browsing after felling, we estimated a sensible loss of production at traditional rotation age (18 years), and an average of 8 years was needed to attain the same level of production as in non-impacted coppices. With only roe deer, an average of 2 years were needed after rotation age to reach expected production. In chestnut coppices, at traditional rotation age (8 years) a loss of wood production was estimated in less than half of all the examined coppices. In these cases 2 more years were estimated to reach the expected production at rotation age. With red deer bark stripping was frequently recorded on both young and older shoots in chestnut coppices. We concluded that in areas with an overabundance of deer such as the one we examined here, there is the need for a change not only in deer management but also in forest management. A shared management strategy of both coppices and deer populations at the different space and time scales is necessary otherwise coppicing will continue to be a factor of strong attraction for deer impact, with serious risks for the conservation of coppice regeneration and productivity. The quick assessment method here presented can be a useful tool for supporting discussion and shared decisions among the different stakeholders involved in natural resource planning and management.
鹿对托斯卡纳土耳其橡木和栗木生产的影响。实验调查和方法论方法
本文的目的是定义一种快速估算马鹿和狍对栗树林地和土耳其栎林地轮作年龄木材产量损失的方法。本研究选取了3个马鹿和狍子种群分布不同或重叠的研究区域。在采伐后2年和5年共选择224个样地。一般产量表用于估算有和没有采伐的灌木林生长情况。结果表明,马鹿区与狍区之间存在明显差异。与火鸡橡木相比,栗子木对鹿的浏览表现出更好的反应。在受马鹿砍伐后啃食影响的土耳其栎林中,我们估计在传统轮作年龄(18年)的产量损失是合理的,平均需要8年才能达到与未受影响的栎林相同的产量水平。如果只饲养狍,平均需要2年才能达到预期产量。在传统轮作年龄(8年)的栗树群落中,估计所有被检查的栗树群落中木材产量的损失不到一半。在这些情况下,估计再过2年才能达到轮换年龄的预期产量。在栗树小枝和老枝上均有马鹿树皮剥落的记录。我们得出的结论是,在鹿数量过多的地区,比如我们在这里考察的地区,不仅需要改变鹿的管理方式,还需要改变森林的管理方式。有必要在不同的空间和时间尺度上对灌木林和鹿群采取共同的管理策略,否则采伐将继续成为鹿群影响的一个强烈吸引力因素,对保护灌木林的再生和生产力构成严重风险。本文提出的快速评估方法可以作为一种有用的工具,用于支持参与自然资源规划和管理的不同利益相关者之间的讨论和共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信